JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACB-IT Archives


ACB-IT Archives

ACB-IT Archives


ACB-IT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACB-IT Home

ACB-IT Home

ACB-IT  September 2004

ACB-IT September 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Post New Message

Post New Message

Newsletter Templates

Newsletter Templates

Log Out

Log Out

Change Password

Change Password

Subject:

Online diabetes advice criticised

From:

Jonathan Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

IT working group of the Association of Clinical Biochemists <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 8 Sep 2004 12:26:37 +0100

Content-Type:

multipart/mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (31 lines) , text/enriched (50 lines) , thisis_bath.gif (50 lines) , thisis_bath.gif (50 lines) , text/plain (79 lines) , text/enriched (108 lines) , mHead2.gif (108 lines) , mHead2.gif (108 lines) , text/plain (60 lines) , text/enriched (89 lines) , 81804_0704_b_300250a.gif (89 lines) , 81804_0704_b_300250a.gif (89 lines) , text/plain (3 lines) , text/enriched (4 lines) , image.tiff (4 lines) , image.tiff (4 lines) , text/plain (15 lines) , text/enriched (24 lines)

Reply

Reply



Begin forwarded message:

> From: Maged N Kamel Boulos <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 8 September 2004 12:03:52 BST
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [bmis-members] Diabetes advice criticised
>
> Thought you might be interested in this:
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/health/ 
> thehealthnews.html?in_article_id=317004&in_page_id=1797
> http://www.thisisbath.co.uk/displayNode.jsp? 
> nodeId=163038&command=displayContent&sourceNode=163527&contentPK=109118 
> 81
>  
> This paper will be presented on September 16 to the 2nd HDL 2004:  
> Workshop on Digital Libraries in Healthcare, held at the University of  
> Bath (see  
> http://www.soi.city.ac.uk/~patty/HDL2004/ 
> HDL%202004%20Workshop%20Abstracts.html).
>  
> Recommended related resource: http://www.pfizerhealthliteracy.com/
>
>  
> With every best wish,
> --Maged N Kamel Boulos
>
>



> This story is brought to you by > http://www.thisisbath.co.uk/displayNode.jsp? > nodeId=163038&command=displayContent&sourceNode=163527&contentPK=109118 > 81 > > WARNING OVER ONLINE ADVICE FOR DIABETICS > > Date : 08.09.04 > >   > A New report has claimed people with diabetes could be suffering > unnecessarily because they do not understand online information. > Researchers at the University of Bath have looked at some of the main > websites people turn to for diabetes information and found them too > hard to understand. > > Now they are warning of potential 'serious consequences' for patients > who are not finding the help they need. > > Dr Maged Boulos, of the University of Bath's School for Health, says > the language of the diabetes pages of the NHS Direct Online site can > only be understood by people whose reading ability is well beyond that > of the average UK citizen. > > He looked at pages about diabetes on 15 internet health sites, run > mainly by charities and official bodies. > > Dr Boulos said: "Sizeable proportions of Western populations have > limited language and maths skills, making it difficult for them to > fully and safely understand and act upon online health information. > > "Public and patient health information that is difficult to understand > or liable to misunderstanding by the lay consumer could result in > serious consequences. > > "Much of the currently available online consumer information on > diabetes needs considerable re-writing to match the general reading > level of the UK population." > > The estimated average reading age of a UK adult is nine years, but Dr > Boulos found that people would need the reading ability of an educated > person aged between 11 and 16.8 years old to understand many of the > sites. > > The hardest of the 15 sites to understand was the NHS Direct Online > site, needing a reading age of an educated person aged 16.8 years, but > other difficult sites were NetDoctor.co.uk (15.2 years), the Juvenile > Diabetes Research Foundation, UK (15.8) and the British Diabetic > Association (14.9). > > Dr Dan Rutherford, medical director of Net Doctor, said its > information on diabetes had recently been re-written and is due to go > live on the internet in a few weeks. > > A Department of Health spokesman said: "We try to make all our > information as easy to understand as possible and are happy to listen > to constructive criticism on how we could improve it." > > Sites identified as having a readability score that was close to the > reading ability of the average Briton were NHS Prodigy, University > College London Hospitals NHS Trust and BestTreatments. > > Dr Boulos recommends that health providers consider other means of > getting health information to the public, such as face-to-face > education and videos. > > The study used the generally accepted Flesch Reading Ease and > Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formulae to test the readability of > documents. > > Dr Boulos was the author of a recent study that showed that the NHS > needed to hire 5,200 more dentists to bring its dental services up to > the standard of other western countries. > > [log in to unmask] > >
> > 07/09/04 - Health news section > > Diabetes advice criticised > > Many diabetes sufferers cannot understand health advice given on an > NHS website, according to a new study published. > > The language of the diabetes pages of the NHS Direct Online site can > only be understood by people whose reading ability is well beyond that > of the average UK citizen, the study revealed. > > But the average reading age of UK citizens is that of an average > educated nine-year-old child, according to the report by Dr Maged > Boulos, of Bath University, creating the potential for "serious > consequences" if the information is misunderstood. > > Dr Boulos looked at pages about diabetes on 15 internet health sites > run mainly by charities and official bodies. > > He concluded that the NHS Direct Online site was the hardest to > understand. He stated that people would need the reading ability of an > educated person aged 16 to comprehend information. > > Other difficult sites were NetDoctor.co.uk and Juvenile Diabetes > Research Foundation, UK, which both required a reading age of at least > 15. > > Sites with readability scores closer to the ability of the average > Briton were NHS Prodigy, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust > and BestTreatments. > > Dr Boulos said: "Sizeable proportions of Western populations have > limited language and maths skills making it difficult for them to > fully and safely understand and act upon online health information. > > "Public and patient health information that is difficult to > understand or liable to misunderstanding by the lay consumer could > result in serious consequences." > > He warned that much online information on diabetes needed > "considerable re-writing" to match the general reading level of the UK > population. > > > > > Find this story at > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/health/ > thehealthnews.html?in_article_id=317004&in_page_id=1797 > ©2004 Associated New Media > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > ADVERTISEMENT
>
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > • To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bmis-members/ >   > • To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > [log in to unmask] >   > • Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service. > >

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
February 2024
January 2024
June 2023
May 2023
January 2023
December 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
October 2021
September 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
November 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
December 2018
February 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
May 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
August 2002
October 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
December 2000
November 2000
June 2000
March 2000
February 2000
September 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager