Nancy
I am very surprised you don't know about the history of the U.K disabled
people's movement and Disabled People's Action Network(DAN)
FREEOURPEOPLE
Regards
Colin R
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nancy Lane" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "ColRevs" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: respect for research
> I don't know anything about you, or DAN or their research.You were citing
> some other sources this morning which were not credible. My primary point
> was that you sent 20 posts in one morning and 3 had high priority alerts.
> This felt like an abuse of the list serve.
>
> If Dan is doing research using quantifiable,controlled studies by doctoral
> and post-doctoral people and publishing the results I am eager to hear
> about it.
>
> Research is one thing, grass-roots activism is quite another.Both are
needed
> and valuable but lets not confuse the two or blur the issue being
discussed.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ColRevs" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: "Nancy Lane" <[log in to unmask]>;
<[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 3:09 PM
> Subject: Re: respect for research
>
>
> > So, disabled people, like myself and other grassroots disabled activists
> > within DAN are not classed as being at the 'cutting-edge' or research ?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Colin R
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Nancy Lane" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: "ColRevs" <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 4:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: respect for research
> >
> >
> > > I find this angry accusation insulting. You know nothing about where I
> > stand
> > > on research or theory. In fact I have been on the cutting edge with
some
> > of
> > > my work and in seeking out the best and newest research for bringing
> > needed
> > > change to many areas of disability information. I remain interested in
> > solid
> > > research, done by qualified researchers who use rigorous standards of
> > > controls for testing.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "ColRevs" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: "Nancy Lane" <[log in to unmask]>;
> > <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 11:21 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Info about the purpose of this list needed
> > >
> > >
> > > > Nancy said....Some of the sites suggested in these many posts do not
> > > contain
> > > > any responsible or scientific
> > > > research done by qualified researchers.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > My reply... So then, Nancy... who do you believe which research we
> > should
> > > > trust by so called 'qualified researchers, who believe they are
> 'right'
> > > and
> > > > others are wrong?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for filling your email box up, but I have got idea how to
solve
> > > this.
> > > > If you don't want to open your mind to 'new' post-modern research an
> you
> > > are
> > > > stuck in the anal-retentive state of the enlightenment period and
> > > modernity
> > > > project, from research theories that has caused so much suffering
and
> > pain
> > > > towards humanity and wars, then that your choice.
> > > >
> > > > You can always just 'press' your 'delete' button on your key-board
or
> > > > instruct your 'voice' activated software to 'delete' it for you.
> > > >
> > > > Once again I apologise if I have caused you and your computer harm
by
> my
> > > > emails today. This was not my intent. I just wanted to empower
others
> > and
> > > I
> > > > though I was doing some good.
> > > >
> > > > You can't seem to win in this global 'cyber' world can you?
> > > >
> > > > As the they... 'you can't please some people all of the time, but
you
> > > can't
> > > > please others some of the times.'
> > > >
> > > > Sorry Nancy, for not pleasing you with my-own research information
> this
> > > > time.
> > > >
> > > > Take-Care
> > > >
> > > > Colin
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Nancy Lane" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 4:06 PM
> > > > Subject: Info about the purpose of this list needed
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I joined this discussion group for broad discussion on the
reasearch
> > > going
> > > > > on in disability studies. Instead I am assaulted by 20, 20!!
emails
> > from
> > > > one
> > > > > person this morning on autism. Three of them were marked high
> priority
> > > > > although I could not detect any reason for the alert. Some of the
> > sites
> > > > > suggested in these many posts do not contain any responsible or
> > > scientific
> > > > > reasearch done by qualified researchers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Perhaps the moderator could explain the purpose of the list if I
> have
> > > > > misunderstood so I can decide whether I want my in box filled
with
> > > > > unnecessary or irrlevant posts.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nancy Lane, Ph.D.
> > > > >
> > > > > ________________End of message______________________
> > > > >
> > > > > Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
> > > > > are now located at:
> > > > >
> > > > > www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
> > > > >
> > > > > You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________
> > > > > This email and all attachments have been scanned by Kingston
> > > > Communications'
> > > > > email Anti-Virus service and no known viruses were detected.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
________________End of message______________________
Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
|