I was just about to reply to this! :-)
You can repeat this element as often as necessary to record all the
schemata you comply with.
L.
On 14 Jul 2004, at 16:57, Phil Barker wrote:
> Andy Powell wrote:
>
>> In discussion about RLLOMAP we weren't sure how to indicate that a
>> record
>> had been created in compliance with RLLOMAP version 1.0.
>>
>> Reading the UK LOM Core v 0.2, I assume that we are supposed to repeat
>>
>> 3.3 metadataSchema
>>
>> to provide three values
>>
>> LOMv1.0
>> UKLOMCorev0.2
>> RLLOMAPv1.0
>>
>> (or whatever). Is this correct?
>>
> yes.
>
> P.
>
> --
> Phil Barker Learning Technology Adviser
> ICBL, School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
> Mountbatten Building, Heriot-Watt University,
> Edinburgh, EH14 4AS
> Tel: 0131 451 3278 Fax: 0131 451 3327
> Web: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/
>
>
--
Lorna M. Campbell
Assistant Director
Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability Standards (CETIS)
Centre for Academic Practice, University of Strathclyde
+44 (0)141 548 3072
http://www.cetis.ac.uk/
|