Hi Ben,
yep, a wet Saturday here in Wales too...
I'd be happy to look at *any* schema you write.
BTW - what's the deal with multiple namespaces in the IEEE schemata? Does
that mean using multiple namespaces in an instance xml document?
Cheers!
Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Ryan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2004 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: Implementing IEEE LOM Metadata
All,
I have looked at the existing IEEE XML Binding and have come to
the conclusion that if we want a really simple schema that is easy to
read and easy to process using castor/xerces etc that I would have to
impose order on the models or develop another way of checking the use of
elements that are only allowed zero or one times.
I would go for the approach of using order but this does mean
that if we validate externally produced LOM files they may fail because
the IEEE LOM does not specify ordering.
Does anybody have any opinions on this before I go ahead and
finalise the first draft?
Nothing like a wet Saturday for writing schemas :)
Regards,
Ben
---------------------------------
Dr Ben Ryan
HLSI Software Development Manager
University of Huddersfield
Tel: 01484 473587
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
---------------------------------
---
This transmission is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you
receive it in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and remove it
from your system. If the content of this e-mail does not relate to the
business of the University of Huddersfield, then we do not endorse it and
will accept no liability.
|