medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
Yes, this is the correct Hughes. My error for conflating the two
(there's a reason for it but it would take too long to explain). My
apologies and my thanks to V. K. Inman for catching the error.
My colleague Robert Bireley's work is excellent but is concerned with
the Catholic Reformation. The original thread had to do with general
histories of the Reformation and my concern was with the (unavoidable)
slant that each author gives to the subject.; Hughes wrote at least one
general history of it, I believe, though I do not have the title at
hand.
Dennis Martin.
>>> [log in to unmask] 05/26/04 3:58 PM >>>
medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and
culture
I take this to be the P. Hughes in question:
The church in crisis; a history of the twenty great councils.
Author:
Hughes, Philip, 1895-1967
Subjects:
Councils and synods, Ecumenical
Publisher:
London, Burns & Oates [1961]
Description:
342 p. 23 cm.
Tom Izbicki
Thomas Izbicki
Collection Development Coordinator
Eisenhower Library
Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, MD 21218
(410)516-7173
fax (410)516-8399
>>> [log in to unmask] 5/26/2004 4:44:23 PM >>>
medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and
culture
I don't get it. Philip Edgecomb Hughes (now deceased) was a low
church
Anglican, serving as an Associate Pastor at a low church episcopal
parish in
Pennsylvania and teaching at the presbyterian, Westminster Theological
Seminary. Why would he provide a catholic view?
Philip Edgecomb Hughes always used his full middle name when publishing
because
of an other (perhaps two) P. E. Hughes, or Philip E. Hughes, scholar
who were
already well published. Could one of these be whom you are referring
to?
This sounds like one for Izbicki.
V. K. Inman
Quoting Dennis Martin <[log in to unmask]>:
> medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and
culture
>
> One note regarding this bibliography: all the authors, in varying
degrees,
> view and interpret the Protestant Reformation from a Protestant
perspective
> (Moorman would probably be closest to a Catholic reading of the
events). For
> some balance, with about the same level of confessional bias but from
the
> Catholic side, one might look at Philip Edgecomb Hughes's or Hubert
Jediin's
> books. Writing from a confessional commitment is not the
problem--buit the
> reader deserves to know where the author he is reading is coming
from.
>
> Dennis Martin
>
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
|