The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  March 2004

DISABILITY-RESEARCH March 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: new book

From:

Shelley Lynn Tremain <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Shelley Lynn Tremain <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:05:40 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (191 lines)

Gregor,

I agree with you.  I would argue however that there was no need to state
anything about so-called "impairments" UNLESS the editors endorse a view of
impairment as Other, as "abnormal," "special," etc.  What proponents of the
social model fail to understand is that disability *precedes* the idea of
impairment, an idea which provides the justification for the multiplication
and expansion of the productive, regulatory, and constraining effects of
disabling power.

S.L. Tremain




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gregor Wolbring" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "Shelley Lynn Tremain" <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: new book



well I find the use of the term impairment in the PR unfortunate as this
seems to show that the editors buy into the ability norms set by certain
structures groups within society.
It would have been better to use a term which does not imply a deficiency
and even better a term which inherently questions the normative
framework.
whether you say non normative functioning abilities and body structure or
different.... or whatever but impairment is the worst one to use.
sure some disabled people might see themselves as impaired but others with
the same biological reality might perceive themselves not as impaired but
simply hindered by societal structures. So it would be better to use a
term which does not put everyone into a certain preset identity.


I think as long as we are seen as a non acceptable divation from a norm
instead of a acceptable variation from a norm we will have a hard time
with societal adaptations.

Well but than may be the editors define see impairment not as the
expression of a medical non accepted divation from a norm
but as something else like just the fact that we are not fitting a norm
without the negative conotsation i apply to the term impairment.



On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Shelley Lynn Tremain wrote:

> Notice how the announcement below demonstrates once again that (despite
> their pronouncements to the contrary) proponents of the social model hold
an
> impairment-based view of disability.  For the announcement does not simply
> state the different modes in which the text will be made available, and,
in
> doing so, imply that universal access (or something approaching it) is a
> human right and should be the rule, not the exception to the rule.
Instead,
> there is a compulsion on the part of the Centre to single out various
groups
> of people who might differ from  "normal book-users" (i.e., sighted people
> or people with 'normal' communication abilities who use printed text) and
> who, insofar as they differ from the norm, require 'special treatment'
when
> it comes to books.
>
>
> S.L. Tremain
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Priestley" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 5:13 AM
> Subject: new book
>
>
> Hi
>
> As some of you may be aware, we were pleased to publish a new title in the
> Disability Press book series this month, as follows:
>
> Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research
>
> Edited by Colin Barnes and Geof Mercer
>
> This book contains 13 chapters on the theoretical and research
implications
> of the social model of disability. Over the last three decades disability
> activists have established the social model of disability as a
comprehensive
> critique of mainstream academic theories and policy approaches. The
> contributors, including established figures and newcomers to the field,
> raise a number of important controversies and concerns central to
theorising
> and researching disability in the 21st century. Taken together they
provide
> ample testimony to the continuing vitality of debates around the social
> model in disability studies. It will prove to be an invaluable addition to
> the growing body of knowledge that underpins disabled people's ongoing
> struggle for a fair and just society.
>
> 'Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research' is also
> available at no additional cost on CD, in PDF format, for ease of access
for
> people with visual or communication related impairments.
>
> 'Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research' is only
> available by mail order
>
> at: 16.50 including postage and packing (20% discount for orders of four
or
> more)
>
> Payment may be by credit card (Visa or Mastercard) via telephone, fax,
> email, or by Stirling cheque drawn on a UK bank (payable to the University
> of Leeds). To order contact Marie Ross
> (44) 113 3434407  (tel. and minicom)
> (44) 113 3434415 (fax)
> email: [log in to unmask]
> or by post at:
>
> Centre for Disability Studies,
> School of Sociology and Social Policy,
> University of Leeds,
> LS2 9JT
> UK
>
> ________________End of message______________________
>
> Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
> are now located at:
>
> www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
>
> You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
>
> ________________End of message______________________
>
> Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
> are now located at:
>
> www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
>
> You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
>


Dr. Gregor Wolbring
webpage: http://www.bioethicsanddisability.org
Member of the Executive of the Canadian Commission for UNESCO
(CCU)

Biochemist at the Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Faculty of Medicine University of Calgary,Alberta,Canada

Adjunct Assistant Professor for bioethical issues
at the Dept. of Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies
Faculty of Education University of Calgary, Alberta Canada

Adjunct Assistant Professor with the John Dossetor Health Ethic Center,
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Founder and Executive director of the International Center for
Bioethics,Culture and Disability
Founder and Coordinator of the International Network on Bioethics and
Disability http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Bioethics/join

Phone 1-403-2108710
Fax   1-403-283-4740
e-mail [log in to unmask]

Mailing address:
Dr. Gregor Wolbring
Dept. of Medical Biochemistry
Faculty of Medicine
University of Calgary
3330 Hospital Drive NW
T2N 4N1
Calgary Alberta Canada

________________End of message______________________

Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:

www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html

You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager