The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds
















By Topic:










By Author:











Monospaced Font








Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password




ColRevs <[log in to unmask]>


ColRevs <[log in to unmask]>


Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:59:05 -0000





text/plain (240 lines)




The essence of DANs Free our People Campaign is to provide all disabled people, regardless of impairment, the choice and the resources to live in the community.

We are hoping that the government acts in a positive way to create the structures and systems required so that everyone has that choice.

Disabled people have been locked away and segregated in institutions too long and it is time for this practice to stop.

We want to cut the link between services and housing, services and education. At the moment if you want the services you must live here or be educated there. We want full inclusion for disabled people in this society.

DAN's campaign could be correctly portrayed as a campaign for those on the sharp end of the discrimination that we call disability.

It would be appropriate given the Governments claims in advancing the rights of disabled people to call this campaign NO DISABLED PERSON LEFT BEHIND.

1. The Social Model

DAN would like to see the government adopt a Social Model approach, which focused on removing the physical and systematic barriers to disabled peoples inclusion.

The new legislation fails to take this approach building on the medical/individual model approach taken by the Tories under the DDA in 1995.

Under this approach (medical model) the reforms the government are proposing are piecemeal and not joined up.

There is no evidence of strategy or cross government thinking or a change in the way that the government is committed to tackle the long-term problems.

As the government is well aware DAN campaigned from 1993 to 1995 to get rid of the Tories who could never understand our radical thinking. It has taken this government 5 years to come up with a hotch potch of measures contained in this Bill.


We in DAN were prepared to work with this government to develop policy but this government has deliberately ignored DAN as a group it wants to deal with.

We have learned that the major charities, which run the institutions that we want to close, have been closely advising the government on the new legislation.

Talking to people who you feel comfortable with is not the way to create a learning government or radical policy.

We call on the government to arrange urgent meetings with DAN to discuss our agenda before the scrutiny process ends.

3. 7 action steps to independent Living

A social model approach would adopt the 7 action steps to independent living as a template for developing policy.

This has not been done.

Below we go over these steps to see what the government could have done and what they are proposing. Birmingham City Council has demonstrated that a political body (i.e. the Council) can adopt the Social Model and begin to plan and review services around the 7 action steps.

The Seven steps to Independent Living devised by Ken and Maggie Davies in the 1970's remain a useful template for looking at the services required to get people and keep people out of institutions.

Below is a description of each step what the government could do to strengthen policy and practice in this area and a commentary on what it is proposing.

 1. Information.

Disabled people need information at the right time in accessible formats about services, processes and procedures that promote independent living so they can make good decisions about their lives.

The best information disabled people receive is still within the voluntary sector. The experience of disabled people is that there are too many places to go for different bits of the Jigsaw.

The government could have announced a duty on Local Authorities and Health care trusts to work together to create one stop shops led by disabled people in the voluntary sector where all the information they need is contained in one place with a dedicated phone line. The government could have recognized and supported the tremendous work disabled people are doing in the voluntary sector.
They haven't.

2. Peer Support and Advocacy

Often when the information is confusing disabled people find it helpful to talk to and learn from other disabled people. Disabled people may feel more comfortable or really need an advocate to work with them when making choices about independent living.

When the system is failing them they may need an advocacy group to campaign to challenge and change the system.

DAN's demand in this area is to call on the government to create Independent Living Centres throughout the country and to place a duty on Local Authorities to develop, fund and support these vital pieces of the jigsaw.

IL Centres are controlled and run by disabled people who are in the best position to be peer counsellors and effective advocates.

DAN also calls on the government to recognize and support through funding BCODP and the National Centre for Independent Living as the principal organizations it would work with in developing and implementing this policy.
The government has done little and understands even less the principles of peer support and advocacy. Let's face it if they had we would actually be implementing the DDA 1995 by now!

Furthermore BCODP and NCIL continue to struggle for the level of funding they need to achieve their mission.

Instead DAN understands that 96p in every pound the government gives to the voluntary sector goes to organizations not controlled by disabled people. These organizations are impairment specific and not based on the Social Model.

In return for this funding these organizations including those running the institutions we are against act as nodding dogs to the governments new proposals.

We understand that the government tries to consult fully with these unaccountable organizations both on the record and behind closed doors down in WC1.

Until the government accepts the principals of self-help, self-empowerment, self-representation and accountability it is hardly likely to deliver what the people want.

3. Housing

Disabled people need affordable accessible and safe housing which is not linked to the services they need around personal assistance.

The chronic lack of this kind of housing in this country means inevitably disabled people and elderly people will be segregated from their families and forced into institutions. The main cause of impairment is age and we are all living longer.

Improvements in our health care will as a consequence create more people who survive trauma and become disabled people.

In 2020 the baby boomers will reach 65 and the number of people with impairments requiring housing will go through the proverbial roof. All of us in this country are heading for a major crisis in housing, pensions and health care.

DAN has called on the government to legislate so that all new housing is built to lifetime homes standards. Whilst we welcome the effect the government has had on the public sector this needs extending to the private sector. Now may already be too late.

The new legislation does little if anything to accomplish this and certainly couldn't be seen as a long-term strategy to avert this crisis.

Encouraging private landlords to make a few adaptations just won't cut it. We call on the government to urgently engage in across the board talks with all concerned including disabled people and to publish long term sustainable plans to avert this crisis that disabled people are already at the sharp end of.

4. Aids and Adaptations.

Some disabled people need aids and adaptations to live independently or to reduce the time that they need personal support.

DAN has called for duty on Local Authorities and Health Care trusts to reduce the waiting time and to simplify and de professionalise the assessment process.

Disabled people should not be means tested for equipment, which they use to get out of bed or into a house, or means that they can cook dinner without relying on someone else.

DAN wants these basic needs addressed free of charge so that we can seek employment.

There is nothing in the government's new legislation that tackles this.

5. Personal Assistance

Even with the other steps in place some disabled people need personal assistance to live independently. This could be assistance with household tasks, money management, support in emotional crisis or help with childcare.

DAN supported the introduction of Direct payments which means that disabled people can hire direct and fire their own assistants however there has been little funding to promote and market this service.

DAN believes that with the creation of Independent living centres pro rata throughout the country, this excellent idea and others could be developed.

DAN also calls for a review of more traditional services and their appropriateness in the 21st century.

We also call for a de linking of this aspect of independent living to either housing for example in sheltered housing, supported living or residential care so that those disabled people in those situations may have some choice and control of who undresses them, what time they go to bed etc.

We call for a targeted and rapid expansion to these schemes to be led by this government.

We call for a marked increase in the rate of pay for those Personal assistants working within the current direct payments schemes.

Finally we call for every disabled person currently living in residential care to be offered the opportunity and the resources to return to the community.

The new Bill does not address these concerns in any way whatsoever.

6. Transport
DAN campaigned throughout the 90's for accessible Public transport and we welcome the improvements so far and that are proposed in the new Bill.

However we feel that the timescales for trains to be accessible is too long. We also note that there are no plans to make the tube accessible in regards to stations in this Bill.

DAN also wants the government to extend their taxi policy to private hire companies to make all new private hire vehicles accessible by law. This could be easily and cheaply done and would offer greater choice for disabled people in all areas.

DAN would also want to review Ring and Ride/ Dial a ride services with a view to comparing them with an alternative taxi card option, which may well, be cheaper and more convenient for disabled people and government alike.

7. Access to the environment.

Disabled people need to have access to the environment; both the built environment and accessible information so they can achieve full participation and equality.

The DDA of 95 and the new proposals that this government is bringing seem to address this, except that without giving the legislation real teeth little is going to change and certainly not at he pace that disabled people want.

Less than 30% of Local Authority buildings are accessible despite the DDA law being on the statute book for 8 years.

The key problem is that individual disabled people have to bring and prove the charge against well-organized and well-briefed opposition.

DAN has called for legislation so that disabled people can bring class action suits against those that are still breaking the law. This would then act as a substantial deterrent to non-compliance and maybe increase the pace of change.

Sadly this proposed Bill doesn't change the situation in the slightest.

They, the government are making laws without policemen.
We are confident that Tony's cronies in the charity system will find it within themselves to welcome this Bill not for what it contains but for what it doesn't. Their institutions are safe and their remains a place to put us away from the community.
We also understand that whilst these issues remain unresolved government initiatives around employment are doomed to fail.

Unless our care packages are transferable from one district to another, unless there is housing available, unless we can have responsive services, employment remains the dream of a small few.
The almost total invisibility of disabled people's issues being addressed in this Bill deeply dismays DAN who did at one time have high expectations for this government.

Their absence means that disabled people will remain in institutions suffering abuse of their human rights on a daily basis.

The disabled people's movement has been ignored and bypassed by the nodding dogs of the charity system who have been a problem for disabled people for many years.

DAN will be in London in March to bring these messages to Government. We will soon know if the Government is scared to talk to real people.

We await your response.

Re: Joining in with this D.A.N. action on the draft Disability Bill from your computer/home.
If anyone has more ideas what we can do from home please post them up on danmail. Contacting Press and sending information/press releases also a great help. if your organisation has a response to the Bill maybe you can share it here for more pointers.

Why out of a five week close scrutiny period allocated to this proposed Bill will just one and a half days will be spent hearing from organisations 'of' disabled people?...

On the first day of action.. (Monday 8th March 2004)

Email your comments about the draft disability Bill to the scrutiny committee at [log in to unmask] . The D.A.N. response to the draft Disability Discrimination Bill is below this message, you can use it for ideas or paste it below your message if you want to, but should also send a message of your own. You can also write to them and send evidence by writing or sending a BSL video or audio tape to: Clerk of the Committee on the Draft Disability Discrimination Bill, The Scrutiny Unit Committee Office, House of Commons, Room G10, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA.

On the second day of action (Tuesday)...

Email the prime Minster from this website about the Bill: ;
Instructions of what to do are on the WebPages. it is hard to tell from this page how accessible it is, but you fill in your email address on the form so maybe danners can help each other out by sending a mate a message and asking them to post it for you if the access is crap. you have to select from the drop down menu a topic, looks like we come under 'other'...

Wednesday - talk to your MP and see if she or he can help.

Email from here but do not send a copied message from below as all our email may be stopped.

You can find out more Government information about the Bill at this WebPages: .

and at the DRC's website, looks like promotion not consultation!

House of Lords info about the scrutiny committee (includes evidence from the DRC): .

GLAD's response to the draft Bill is here, published online no less, thanks!:

DAN's response as previously posted:

________________End of message______________________

Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:

You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Advanced Options


November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998

JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at and Jisc's privacy policy at

For help and support

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager