Whoops, in snakyheaded retrospect I now recognize that my comment must
have seemed to be questioning David's integrity. I readily confess
awkwardness, but protest no intention to criticize. I was merely taking up
from where Jon left off, and trying to acknowledge his uncertainty about
whether or not it was David who had made the comment (at the Yale
conference, which alas I did not attend, being then but a babe in arms).
My public apologies. -az
> I'm glad for the chance to re-assign the credit where it's due--thanks,