I think this illustrates my point further.
If there is a corporate retention schedule, then all records are managed,
wherever they are, in current systems, or in the Record Centre. And by now,
the Schedule should include electronic systems as well as paper ones. The
Schedule is a dynamic component of an RKS, and needs to be kept up to date.
Equally, a high percentage of the records listed on the schedule will never
be transferred to a Record Centre, but be managed by their creators, and
destroyed or archived according to the rules laid down in the Schedule.
Robert Chell
Records Manager
for general requests please use
Records Management Service
> ----------
> From: Phil Bradshaw[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Reply To: Phil Bradshaw
> Sent: 29 January 2004 10:17
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Local Government and LAWS categorisation
>
> Jayne is correct.
>
> We have no problems with the excellent work of Glamorgan Record Office
> where we use them. The problem lies with those services which do not use
> them, and with the current records of those who do - i.e. before the files
> are passed to GRO.
>
******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the administrator on the following address:
[log in to unmask]
Mae'r e-bost hwn ac unrhyw ffeiliau a drosglwyddir gydag ef yn
gyfrinachol ac at ddefnydd yr unigolyn neu'r corff y cyfeiriwyd
hwy atynt yn unig. Os ydych wedi derbyn yr e-bost hwn drwy
gamgymeriad, dylech hysbysu'r gweinyddydd yn y cyfeiriad canlynol:
[log in to unmask]
*******************************************************************
|