JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for TUNICATA Archives


TUNICATA Archives

TUNICATA Archives


TUNICATA@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TUNICATA Home

TUNICATA Home

TUNICATA  2004

TUNICATA 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Protochordata?

From:

"Billie J. Swalla" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:37:32 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (176 lines)

Hi Martina,

        I agree with Patricia Mather and the others that Tunicata is the 
correct term for the fascinating group of marine invertebrates that we 
all know and love.  I even looked up Lamarck's 1816 treatise, which is 
a good read for those interested that can read French.  I do not know 
why "urochordate" gained such widespread usage, but it is used mostly 
in England and the U.S.   Gretchen Lambert has suggested that the term 
"urochordata" never really caught on in Europe or Japan.

A recent pubmed search with tunicata and urochordata got
urochordata: 1763 references
tunicata: 1777 references

        The term "protochordate" is more problematic, I think.  I was asked 
twice this year to write reviews on "protochordates", so I have had 
some time to think about it.  In reviewing gastrulation, I reviewed 
ascidian and lancelet gastrulation (Swalla, 2004).  However, for the 
Canadian Journal of Zoology Protochordate issue, I was asked to include 
hemichordates in my review of Protochordate phylogeny.  Since 
hemichordates are clearly sister group to echinoderms (not chordates), 
I found this problematic, but went ahead and reviewed all of the 
deuterostomes.  I also went back and read Barrington's delightful book 
"The Biology of Hemichordata and Protochordata".  Barrington considered 
tunicates and lancelets "Protochordates" and Hemichordates to be a 
separate phylum.  However, he suggests that graptolites (fossil 
pterobranch hemichordates) and pogonophora (deep sea polychaetes) may 
also be protochordates.  Does anyone know an earlier reference to 
"protochordates?"  I don't like the term because it suggests that 
present day tunicates and lancelets are similar to their long ago 
ancestors, even though we know that they are highly specialized and 
evolved extant marine animals.  It seems to be back in usage again, 
though.

        My favorite quote from Barrington's book is "It will be apparent that 
the protochordates are more successful than most animals in concealing 
their pedigree and their interrelationships”.  I can certainly agree 
with him there!

        Happy holidays!
        Billie J. Swalla

Barrington, E.J.W. 1965. The Biology of Hemichordata and Protochordata. 
(Oliver & Boyd), Edinburgh & London, U.K.
Lamarck, J.B. 1816. Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans Vertebrates. 
Tome III. Tuniciers. Déterville, Paris pp 80-130
Swalla, B. J. 2004. “Protochordate Gastrulation: Lancelets and 
Ascidians.” In: Gastrulation; Claudio Stern, ed. Cold Spring Harbor 
Press. pp 139-149.


On Dec 17, 2004, at 4:18 PM, martina grey wrote:

> Dear Tunicatists
>
> The word 'urochordate' has the advantage that it reinforces the notion 
> that we are dealing with a type of chordate, not with just another 
> boring minor inverebrate group. The same applies to 'protochordate', 
> which is increasingly popular. People think that their grant 
> applications gain relevance if they are about chordates. Are they 
> right? Am I being cynical?
> Does 'protchordate' have any taxonomic validity?
>
> Martina
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tito Lotufo" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Urochordate Conference
> Date:         Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:59:31 -0300
>
>>
>> Dear Dr. Goodbody and other list members,
>> Although I agree with Dr. Mather and use Tunicata instead of 
>> Urochordata,
>> the ICZN rules of precedence (chapter 6, Article 23.1) apply only to 
>> the
>> level of family and lower categories (genus and species), as 
>> previously
>> pointed out by another list member some time ago.
>> Nevertheless, we all must do our best in order to keep the uniformity 
>> of the
>> zoological nomenclature and try to use the same names regardless its
>> category. This is specially important for our students, as different 
>> names
>> for the same thing are always a source of confusion and 
>> misunderstanding.
>> Regards,
>> Tito
>> _____________________________________
>> Tito M. C. Lotufo
>> Universidade Federal do Ceará
>> Departamento de Engenharia de Pesca
>> Tel: (85) 288-9726 FAX: (85) 287-6940
>> E-mail: [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>> on 17.12.04 18:00, Prof. Ivan Goodbody at [log in to unmask]
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Prof. Ivan Goodbody
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 3:43 PM
>>> Subject: Urochordate Conference
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear List members,
>>>
>>> On 5th June 2003 Patricia Mather posted a message to The List
>>> reminding us all
>>> that the Class of animals in which we are interested is Tunicata and 
>>> not
>>> Urochordata. Patricia's message was clear and authoritative. The 
>>> message
>>> identifies the history and development of the taxonomic nomenclature 
>>> and
>>> why,in accordance with the Rules, Tunicata Lamarck 1816 must take 
>>> precedence
>>> over Urochordata Balfour 1881. A few of us may have felt scolded or 
>>> even
>>> humbled by Patricia's message and at least one University found it 
>>> necessary
>>> to rewrite their lab manuals for students. Some textbooks still 
>>> require
>>> revision.
>>> In the light of this it comes as a surprise to learn that yet another
>>> Urochordate conference is planned to take place in Santa Barbara 
>>> next July.
>>> Happily the message about the Conference was addressed to 
>>> Tunicatists and not
>>> to Urochordatists and maybe the organisers could be persuaded to 
>>> rename the
>>> Conference as a Tunicate Conference. The continued use of the
>>> name Urochordata
>>> instead of Tunicata sends the wrong message to students and
>>> younger colleagues
>>> who should be encouraged to respect The International Rules of 
>>> Zoological
>>> Nomenclature.
>>> Irrespective of the title of the Conference I cannot be in Santa 
>>> Barbara in
>>> July but for those who attend to discuss Tunicate biology I wish you 
>>> fruitful
>>> exchanges.
>>>
>>> IVAN GOODBODY
>>> Professor Emeritus of Zoology
>>> University of the West Indies
>
Happy holidays to you and your loved ones!

Dr. Billie J. Swalla
Associate Professor
Box 351800
24 Kincaid Hall
Biology Department
University of Washington
Seattle, WA       98195-1800

Phone: 206-616-9367
Fax:     206-616-2011
E-mail:  [log in to unmask]
http://faculty.washington.edu/bjswalla/

Check out our 2002 summer course at FHL
"Comparative Embryology of Invertebrates"
http://courses.washington.edu/emb2002/

Check out our 2001 summer course at FHL
"Evolution and Development of the Metazoans"
http://www.whoi.edu/science/B/people/khalanych/evodevo2001/index.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
December 2021
November 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager