Dear All
Please see the attached responses from Klaas and Paul at SURFnet
Best Regards
James Sankar
_____________________________
Network Access Project Manager
UKERNA
Advanced Technology Group
ATLAS Centre, Chilton
Oxfordshire, OX11 0QS
Tel: 01235 822223
Fax: 01235 822399
-----Original Message-----
From: James Sankar [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 02 April 2004 13:48
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-ADMIN] [802.1x workshop: 30-31 March, 2004]
Hi All
I've passed this onto SURFnet for their opinions, once I receive a response
I will let you know
Best Regards
James Sankar
_____________________________
Network Access Project Manager
UKERNA
Advanced Technology Group
ATLAS Centre, Chilton
Oxfordshire, OX11 0QS
Tel: 01235 822223
Fax: 01235 822399
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Staniforth [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 02 April 2004 11:41
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-ADMIN] [802.1x workshop: 30-31 March, 2004]
Bill,
We are also interested in this problem. I believe Microsoft regard it as a
"security feature".
Regards, Ian
Bill Byers wrote:
> Quoting James Sankar <[log in to unmask]>:
>
>
>>I attended a 802.1X workshop on Tuesday, as promised, I attach my
>>notes from the workshop to this email. The presentation slides should
>>be online at the link below soon.
>>
>
> Was there any discussion in the workshop of the
> "XP disabled broadcast SSID" problem where a broadcast SSID always
> takes priority over a non-broadcast SSID regardless of the order in
> the list of preferred networks.
>
> As we would like to offer two SSIDs from our cisco APs, one for
> web-based or VPN authentication and a second for 802.1x, you can see
> how this is a show-stopper.
>
> Bill Byers
> Edinburgh University Computing Service
--
Ian Staniforth
Corporate Information & Computing Services
University of Sheffield
Computer Centre
Hounsfield Road
Sheffield S3 7RF
Tel: (0114) 222 3021 Fax: (0114) 222 3130
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
|