JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  2004

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: power/control

From:

patrick lichty <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

patrick lichty <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 6 Sep 2004 10:37:45 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (76 lines)

This conversation is getting really meaty.

Let's consider one thing.
Sooner or later, _someone_ is going to create a classification that will
stick in the history books, regardless of how distasteful that might
sound.  It might take 5 years, 20, or 100, but it will happen, and
eventually we will all be quite dead, and unable to object.

Power and control - I have no answer to this, but will we as
technological artists (note I'm not using NM, as I'm talking more
broadly), come to some social contract regarding our own
taxonomies/classifications, or Powers forbid, announce a 'Movement'?  In
this project, there will have to be a lot of negotiation and compromise
if we are to define ourselves (hopefully quite broadly).  If not, the
'we' who are historians and curators will classify the technological
genres in the artists' stead.

I know several historians who are in the gates getting ready to do just
this.  And when they publish, that's that, or at least as more of them
publish, it will become more of a fait accompli.  The pin will be
through the thorax of the butterfly.

Some of you may object to this, and to an extent, so do I.  However,
this is historiography, and are we going to be Smithsons or Bierstadts
(shaping the terrain, or masterfully representing it)?


Patrick Lichty
Editor-In-Chief
Intelligent Agent Magazine
http://www.intelligentagent.com
1556 Clough Street, #28
Bowling Green, OH 43402
225 288 5813
[log in to unmask]

"It is better to die on your feet
than to live on your knees."


-----Original Message-----
From: Curating digital art - www.newmedia.sunderland.ac.uk/crumb/
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ivan Pope
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 10:20 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: power/control

> Subject: power/control
>
> While conceding that, of course, taxonomies are made in the
> service of power and control, simply to imagine that we can
> dispense with them seems to me to be problematic. I suggest
> the alternative is not the occupation of some space beyond
> the control of categories and so on

Personally, I've been waiting for this discussion to get to grips with
taxonomies, rather than with discussion of terms such as 'new media' and
'media art'.

I guess if we are discussing taxonomies we should discuss the taxonomy
of
our field and not get bogged down in the 'is new media a good term for
this,
is there a better term'.
The problem with taxonomies is that they require some groundwork and
then
that that groundwork be generally accepted, and then that there be some
way
of categorising entries into that taxonomy. Do we really want to go down
that formal route?

What could a taxonomy be for the field that Crumb covers?

Cheers,
Ivan

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager