JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  2004

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: exhibition producer

From:

ana boa-ventura <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ana boa-ventura <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 4 Jul 2004 15:53:19 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (204 lines)

Hi Marc, Johannes and all,

Since we all come from many cultural backgrounds - one of the great things
about lists - often some clarification is needed. So here goes...

When i say "I guess it is ok" that a list transcribes a posting from another
list/forum, I mean: I used to *really* think it was ok. That "I guess" is a
result of Johannes' posting, after which I realized I may have intellectual,
ethical (and even rhetorical) issues with such cross-postings, unless some
conditions are observed. These are my own thoughts that will lead my own
practice and that I'm sharing with you, for what it's worth:

When a posting is quoted on a different list, the original author most
probably won't get the quote.That is what the whole "reader-author blurred
boundaries" is all about and I see it as a good thing. Now... If rather than
the desired conversation any mailing list should promote, that quote is
followed by a "let's make a joke out of it" posting, then it's sort of a
strike with no opportunity for response. In some intellectual milieus that
may be ok... rhetorically, however, it's weak, and ethically it's
unacceptable. The solution? CC the author. That is your guarantee of
"transparency". I don't see why a new medium should make us regress in what
we've learned about ethics of communication. In fact I think the new media
should heighten our observance of that ethics... which is what I am writing
this.

And Marc: no, I have no agenda with Johannes whom i had never heard of. I
genuinely believe his email was scornful - colleagues/friends in this list
agree. If some of you are schocked that this is my response to Johannes 2nd
posting, then there may be another cultural issue here: where I am coming
from, if A says to B "it was not my intention", it doesn't necessarily
follow that it is so. B should reassess the whole situation and draws
conclusions. And these may be that there was indeed such an intention.

Johanne's Merriam Webster definition starts with "producer" (the "exhibiton"
was dropped somewhere along the way) as "1. the one who grows agricultural
products" (Why was #2 left out as [...], is what i wonder... "2. a furnace
or apparatus that produces combustible gas"). I don't know of any culture
where this is not read as scornful...

Finally, Johannes: by "incestuous relationship" between discussion
lists/forums I don't "really mean" anything: it's a metaphor as I am sure
that the German background you mention makes you comfortable with, as does
my Portuguese one. We are both fortunate that way.

Regards to all. Fear not - i'll spam you no more.:) I just thought this
might be relevant for others as it informed my way of doing cross-postings
in the future.
Ana Boa-Ventura







----- Original Message -----
From: "marc" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: [NEW-MEDIA-CURATING] exhibition producer


Hi ana,

ana: That a mailing list includes a literal transcription of what is
posted in a
forum (in this case, net art review), I guess it is ok.

I happen to believe that it is ok. I see that Josephine's decision to
copy/redistribute and place your text into this forum as a generous
action - I percieve her manouver as a social, lateral act. And your name
was mentioned as the person who had brought about its context orginally
via Net Art Review, reflecting your own ideas around the subject.

So, the function of her posting has served to open up the debate,
widened the seemingly ever cloudy idea(s) of what a curator/exhibition
organizer actually is, and your writing has contributed to this, which I
believe is a good thing, for all concerned.

I found your text to be informative - and I thank you for writing it,
and I also thank J.Bosma in being generous to post it here...because
before now, I was not aware of it.

In regard to Harald Szeemann, he can call himself what he wants, like
you say. People can (and do) reinteprete as they wish, but people should
be able to define and redefine their own creative activity on their own
terms first of all - then others can do what they wish in a cultural
sense afterwards.

And yes - Johannes posted a post that did not actually deal with the
context of what your writing was trying to get across successfully, but
I believe him when he says that he did not wish to offend - I did not
see him as deliberately wishing to hurt you, unless there are agendas at
work between the both of you which I might not be aware of, which is
always a possibility.

This is one the things that happens on lists - yet many would of read
your text at the same time and thought mmm - there are some good points
there...

I would love other people to be posting my own writings/thoughts on my
behalf (whatever reason) on a forum such as this, in a place where
changes are instigated culturally - it happens more on other, less
self-conscious lists. On here - people are perhaps more (self censoring)
and aware of their careers, whcih of course can make things a little dry
and less fluid. I prefer a bit more battling going on around ideas in
respect of exploring concepts/creativity/politics - it can get a bit
tense but the energy itself can help produce some very progressive
discoveries for all concerend - which is great...

much respect

marc






 >Hello,
 >
 >That a mailing list includes a literal transcription of what is posted
in a
 >forum (in this case, net art review), I guess it is ok. But then... when
 >those literal transcriptions are ridicularized like here with some
abridged
 >online dictionary definitions, with the purpose of serving some
undefinable
 >agendas... then this incestuous relationship across forums/mailing
lists on
 >the same topic of interest is jeopardized.
 >
 >So I'll reserve my comments on a personal email to Johannes. Bottom line
 >being - i'm afraid Harald Szeemann calls himself whatever he wants
 >regardless of what Johannes thinks (or should i say - the Merriam
 >Webster)...
 >
 >Ana Boa-Ventura
 > ----- Original Message -----
 >From: "Goebel, Johannes" <[log in to unmask]>
 >To: <[log in to unmask]>
 >Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 12:03 AM
 >Subject: Re: [NEW-MEDIA-CURATING] exhibition producer
 >
 >
 >"Exhibition producer" - - - "Curator"
 >
 >Merriam-Webster online:
 >
 >Producer:
 >1: one that produces; especially: one that grows agricultural products or
 >manufactures crude materials into articles of use
 >...
 >3: a person who supervises or finances the production of a stage or screen
 >production or radio or television program
 >4: any of various organisms (as a green plant) which produce their own
 >organic compounds from simple precursors ... and many of which are food
 >sources for other organisms -- compare CONSUMER
 >
 >Curator:
 >Etymology: Latin, from curatus, past participle of curare to care,
from cura
 >care
 >: one that has the care and superintendence of something;
 >
 >
 >
 >                Johannes Goebel
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >-----Original Message-----
 >From: Josephine Bosma [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
 >Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 7:24 AM
 >To: [log in to unmask]
 >Subject: exhibition producer
 >
 >>From netartreview.net
 >
 >
 >Now... that is a designation I like: Harald Szeemann, art
 >critic and historian, and curator for the exhibitions of
 >the Forum Barcelona 2004 calls himself an "exhibition
 >producer". With a curricuum that includes the direction of
 >Documenta 5 in Kassel, and of the 48th and 49th editions
 >of the Venice Biennale, Szeemann became known in the art
 >world as a symbol of the independent exhibition curator.
 >
 >There are four thematic exhibitions that present narratives
 >of cultural diversity, sustainable development and the
 >conditions for peace. The four themese/spaces are "Voices"
 >and "Cities - Corners" both at the Barcelona International
 >Convention Center, "Inhabiting the World" at the Viewpoint
 >Port and "Warriors of Xi'an" at the Sant AdriÓ (Moll del Parc).
 >
 >(...)
 >
 >by Ana Boa-Ventura
 >
 >

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager