JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  2004

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

gate keeping & who gets seen...

From:

marc <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

marc <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:27:48 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (141 lines)

Firstly, I would like to thank all those who have sent me personal 
emails (which surprised me, and there are quite a few) regarding this 
issue. And also, a thank you to Sarah & Simon who both declared 
honourable text’s that I agreed with on the whole…

It seems that many are too afraid to openly declare their own 
experiences and misgivings on this list because they fear being 
blacklisted or not included in certain funding or potentially 
collaborative remits. Isn’t that a sad state of affairs?

Secondly, I would like to welcome the sudden (masked) appearance of 
'Secret Fluxus' to this list.

Hello ‘secret Fluxus’ - you may have managed to place (hopefully not 
deliberately) Jess in a box that is not appropriate to the discussion 
needed on here. By inferring that Jess is only interested in her own 
state of being or personal, nationalist vision or as you say 'special 
pleading to give British artists a place in the American sun', you have 
managed to belittle original intentions – if you are seriously 
progressive then you will not mind who wishes to have their own voice 
heard. Whether one wishes to change the currently stale ‘new media’ 
hierarchies as an artist or as a group, there is plenty of room for 
alternative imaginations to explore such options; seen and acknowledged 
(or not, as is the case here).

So what you are said you are doing is of course admirable...

If you really are a secret ‘Fluxus entity’, or belong to a Situationist 
sect/group – you might possibly (hopefully) be aware or informed that 
the ‘Temporary Autonomous Zone’, is no longer appropriate. It does not 
work any more, it merely puts those who refer and expound its relevance 
in the driving seat, and those who lived it, become consumable 
curiosities. Fodder left in the vaults of selected historical annuals, 
categorized as ‘safe = past’ therefore, ineffectual.

Rather than taking on the very real and urgent challenges at hand, 
certain default led individuals and groups would rather just say ah, he 
or she is just whining. One of the most commonly used weapons, tactics 
by despotic rulers, or tactically controlling organizations; is to drown 
out valid concerns, dissent and social disquiet by stigmatizing them as 
whiners. Dumbing it down to a level that cheapens the original intention 
itself. Putting it all down to a backward non progressive act of jealousy…

In essence these tactics and responses are psychologically reactionary. 
Such properties are mannerist, whether conscious or not - they do serve 
to inflict disempowerment and do act to trivialize the disputer’s voice, 
diverting them and others away from the actual context of what was 
originally argued or disputed. A patriarchal function (similar to 
governmental functions) that pulls rank, displacing the upstart in 
question and literally placing them to the back of the queue called 
'shut up listen person'.

Thomas Moore said 'All attempts to give a strict form to life, even if 
they are based in a fantasy of self improvement, participate in Sadeian 
monastic ideals'.

This is the perptually (unconscious probably) repeated action that 
occurs between situations suchas this.

Jean Dubuffet wrote 'What cultured people want, in terms of language 
(and thought), is to be well-defined, correctly positioned in strictly 
combined terms, and this is what they call good speech, good thought, 
and good writing. But they do not realize that they are thereby creating 
a closed circuit that leaves no room for anything but what was there in 
the first place---except for the decomposition inherent to all closed 
circuits, like moss that grows in a hermetically sealed jar.'

The psychological relationship between academic intelligence and 
outsider intellectuals has been a constant battle through history and 
one that institutions should not be proud of. The stance that many 
academic individuals use to hide their emotional and intellectual 
inadequacies is to add clout to their own use of language by imposing 
the official 'wild card' that they know more because they have gone 
through the process of induced learning. This failing of coming to terms 
to the idea, the reality that actually there might be equivalent, 
relevant ideas and people out there that have not of been processed by 
the same protocols, is shameful. For this puts in place barriers 
enhanced via denial, plus the default of the traditional and tiresome 
dichotomy of, we are right and you are not. 'We are right and you are 
not' does not even have to be said, for it is assumed.

What this means is that the probability for those who have not had 
institutional support compared to those who have had institutional 
support, regarding being seen by writers and critics with strong 
institutional connections, is a vast chasm. For institutional historians 
for some reason by habit it do not value social change, they seem to 
value history instead. Thus they do not feel that it as part of their 
remit to put forward a more democratic vision. A more realistic 
multi-explorative world.

Secret Fluxus - Your secrecy worries me slightly, because you could be 
either a group of top down instigators and we have no way of knowing 
that - your acceptance or recognition that something is indeed not 
working does declare a mutual possibility that I do warm to; yet, 
declaration of your selves, or yourself can open things up a little in 
regard to the dynamics of this current argument. Then, I will feel that 
you are putting your money where your mouth is (excuse the wording here).

Getting back to what I view as a misdirected reference yet seemingly 
relevant statement 'special pleading to give British artists a place in 
the American sun'. May be it would be more constructive to redirect that 
statement elsewhere. Surely the Tate needs to stop gloating on American 
institutions and go wider a field, invite other groups who are not 
necessarily institutionally supported but are equally effective in their 
critical and fluid presence and experience in respect of new media (hate 
that word), digital and networked creativity. Perhaps be more 
imaginative, playful, and less self-conscious and include a mixture – 
surely this is more productive rather than supporting the same old 
names, perpetually building larger walls.

It is not about wanting to be part of an institution as many might 
think. No, many of us have opted out of such things to consciously 
discover other options instead, forging new territories that are 
actually very exciting and offer great rewards. There is nothing more 
stimulating than building something of value that is special, with other 
like-minded people who are passionately involved in the process, 
context, inventing, re-inventing new fields and platforms that were not 
there before for others to enjoy with you. In fact it is beautiful, 
magical and contextually liberating, and one is continuously 
reevaluating, relearning, learning new ways to negotiate and 
communicate. Sharing self- made platforms independently is a respectable 
thing to do, not a negative thing. And what many of these groups and 
people are asking is that they should be seen, not ignored.

No, of course soft groups such as Furtherfield do not wish to become the 
same as other more static, bricks and buildings ‘hard groups’, who 
(obviously) find it less easier to move beyond the remits of traditional 
constraints. We wish to be working with people who have vision beyond 
top down led conferences, who actively work together because they 
believe in what they are doing collectively. Who are genuinely wishing 
for something better than what is already here – build a new creative 
world that does not rely on history alone to change our perceptions, we 
want to change things now, not tomorrow.

Those who are not comfortable with such changes will view this sort of 
talk as scary. Well, we are not asking for a revolution silly, we are 
asking for an evolution, that’s all – calm down. Do your job and let 
others be seen…

marc

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager