JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-PROFESSION Archives


LIS-PROFESSION Archives

LIS-PROFESSION Archives


LIS-PROFESSION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-PROFESSION Home

LIS-PROFESSION Home

LIS-PROFESSION  2004

LIS-PROFESSION 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: CILIP effectiveness

From:

Fiona McLean <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Chartered Library and Information Professionals <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:24:37 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (154 lines)

There are the services run on our behalf by the staff (and determined by
the committees), *in addition to* the valuable work of members in
branches and sigs.  Perhaps it is because those central services are
paid for by our subs, or are charged for, that they are such an issue? 

Of course, its also true that the committees who agree policy are also
members, and represent us all.  

And I am all for us working together- doesn't have to be an 'us and
them' situation between paid staff and members, or one between ordinary
members and those on council.

I don't know if its been addressed yet re my query on what mechanism
exists for contacting/discussing issues with members of council? How do
we have an influence/say on policy decisions and what the executive
focus on? Needs to be something in addition to the AGM.

Does anyone know of another membership organisation where things run
more smoothly between the various parties (staff, members, members in
power?) Is there anything we can learn from them?

Fiona

-----Original Message-----
From: Ajibade, Tayo [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 08 November 2004 17:57
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: CILIP effectiveness

I disagree. CILIP effectiveness is a function of the members
participation. Members participate in branches and special interest
groups. The work of every branch and special interest group does count!

Every person who is a member of CILIP and participates in activities
based on that membership contributes to the effectiveness of CILIP.
Ordinary members, executive, council, branches and special interest
groups are CILIP. CILIP HQ is our executive. As we are all part of
CILIP, if we want things to improve, we need to work together. 

If a specific course is needed in a particular area:
(1) Are there members in the area willing to host a course if enough
local members in that area expressed an interest? 
(2) Has anyone contacted the local branch, CILIP member services team or
the CILIP training team to ask if the course could be held locally?

There are certain functions the executive perform on our behalf. If we
want more staff effort/resources spent on real membership activities and
concerns, let us help them to focus. Simplifying the collection of
subscriptions and giving all CILIP members the opportunity to pay by
instalments, would be a step in the right direction. It is a win/win
situation, as the cost which is difficult to meet in one go, if you
personally have to pay for your membership, can then be spread out,
everyone will be able to benefit from the early bird discount,
subscription payments become manageable within a person's budget. 

If we think more long term, simpler automated subscription renewals,
with the member services team focused on recruiting new members instead
chasing lapsed ones, might lead to a greater overall reduction in
membership subscriptions or a freeze as the total number of CILIP
members increased. 

Let us all work together to be constructive. When we complain about the
effectiveness of CILIP, we are actually complaining about ourselves.

Tayo Ajibade
CILIP in London Committee Member



-----Original Message-----
From: Chartered Library and Information Professionals
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Fiona McLean
Sent: 08 November 2004 16:51
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: CILIP effectiveness


I quite agree with you. All the work of the branches and groups needs to
be separate in this particular debate. It hardly involves CILIP
staff/resources in any effort!

I cant remember any outside London either (but haven't been looking).

-----Original Message-----
From: Carsten Mandt [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 08 November 2004 16:48
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: CILIP effectiveness

I didn't mean to do injustice to the special interest groups etc that do
run
courses outside of London but nevertheless, over the few years I've been
a
member of CILIP I can't recall seeing any advertisements for courses run
by
CILIP itself that were not in London. But that might just be my patchy
memory...

Carsten Mandt

> Carsten Mandt wrote:
>
> > Considering how all the training courses CILIP offers are also
always
> > London-based maybe CILIP should introduce a tiered subscriptions
system
> > based on how far your (UK) base is from London, not on how much you
> earn.
>
> CILIP's courses are *not* always London based. The Branches and
Special
> Interest Groups run courses around the country. I can't quote chapter
> and verse on all of them but over the last year UKeIG, for example,
has
> organised meetings and workshops in Newcastle, Manchester, Birmingham,
> Belfast, Glasgow and Edinburgh.
>
> --
> Karen Blakeman, UKeIG Councillor & Chair of Executive Board
> 88 Star Road, Caversham, Berks RG4 5BE, UK
> Tel:+44 118 947 2256, Mobile: +44 7764 936733
> Fax:+44 870 056 8547
> Mailto:[log in to unmask], Web - http://www.rba.co.uk/
>

--
Geschenkt: 3 Monate GMX ProMail + 3 Top-Spielfilme auf DVD
++ Jetzt kostenlos testen http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail ++

This is an email from Baker & McKenzie, solicitors. The contents of this
email and all its attachments may contain legally privileged or
confidential information. It is intended solely for the ordinary user of
the email address to which it was addressed.  No one else may copy or
forward all or any of it in any form.

Our postal address is 100 New Bridge Street, London, EC4V 6JA, United
Kingdom, at which address a list of our partners may be inspected.  If
you receive this email in error, we should be obliged if you would
telephone our postmaster on +44 20 7919 1000 or email
[log in to unmask] Thank you.

We are regulated by the Law Society: please see
http://www.bakernet.com/London/Regulation

PLEASE NOTE that all incoming emails will be automatically scanned by us
and by an external provider to eliminate potential viruses and
unsolicited promotional emails (spam).  This could result in deletion of
a legitimate email before it is read by its intended recipient at our
firm. Please tell us if you have concerns about this automatic
filtering.

Baker & McKenzie, an English partnership, is a member of Baker &
McKenzie International, a Swiss Verein.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager