I think will think redhat way :
You can install a package and deactivate the service with the
functions/local folder y rewriting the functions that activate it.
Lp
On 10 déc. 04, at 13:02, Fabien Wernli wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 12:40:08PM +0100, Jeff Templon wrote:
>>
>> which would effectively remove spark from the system. The meta-RPM
>> idea
>> is nice, but there should be more granularity, certainly for optional
>> packages like Tank&Spark. Otherwise I have to rebuild the RPM myself,
>> or perhaps yank out all the dependencies with a script and put them
>> into
>> a quattor list, where I have a remove_pkg function.
>
> excellent point.
> My idea would be to hierarchize the meta-packages, usingi:
>
> 1) top-level metapackages lcg-WN, lcg-WN-torque, etc. like we have now
> 2) lower-level metapackages like lcg-tank-spark, lcg-pbs, etc.
> 3) include the lower-level meta-packages into the top-level
> metapackages.
>
> of course we can have more than 2 levels.
>
> What do you think?
>
--
Louis Poncet
Where: Bat28-R-003 CERN
CH-1211 Geneve 23
Mail : [log in to unmask]
Phone: +41(0)227.674.231
LAL / IN2P3 / CNRS / CERN
Problem >> RTFM then google it !
|