What's public and what's private.

Interestingly it is the patients who are being squeezed here.
But you would never know it from the way either of the larger parties are
behaving.

Never mind clinical governance, what about organisational governance.

Alasdair

On 21/8/04 11:23 am, "Fay Wilson" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: "alasdair" <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 10:48 AM
>
>
>> The lambeth walk group practice is technically part of a Medical college
> in
>> south London. (we used to describe the practice as the slush fund for the
>> remaining academics in the department of primary care, because no separate
>> accounts were kept for 5 years.)
>>
>> Both Kings and the PCT have ganged up against the practice to try and
> force
>> Them to agree to a plan, with no transparent disclosure [still after  2
>> years] of the future financial risks to the practice or indeed the PCT.
>>
>> We are experiencing what feels like both ostrich head in the sand
> behaviour
>> and scapegoating of the practice at the same time - which is a strange
>> combination.  Is this an unusual situation or does this sort of madness
>> happen all over the country :-)
>>
>> We need help on grounds of clinical and organisation governance.
>> If I shared the story a bit more might you be able to help?
>
> Alasdair
> Sounds horrible but yes, this sort of madness happens all over the country.
> Most important the practice stick together and also that you get support.
> Have to talked to the LMC?
>
> I'm not sure this is the sort of story that should be shared in detail on a
> public site however; is there some other way you could share it more
> privately?
> --
> Fay