Hi,
thank you very much, that does answer most of my question. The only other
thing is, if the corrected p-values are essentially the same for both
articles, is one or the other method used to generate the p-values used by
the program? (is one used to get the p-value as a default, or if they are
both used, if they differ is the more conservative one used?). I am trying
to respond to a question about which one of these 2 articles the p-value
determination came from, which is why I'm wondering about this so
specifically.
thanks,
Katie
On 11/9/04 11:55 PM, "Joseph Devlin" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear Katie,
>
> Forman and Friston independently proposed using spatial extent as a method
> for correcting for the multiple comparison problem which is why both
> references are listed in the report.html page. The methods give
> essentially the same corrected p-values (the P column in the Feat report).
>
> Hope that answers your question.
> All the best,
>
> Joe
>
> --------------------
> Joseph T. Devlin, Ph. D.
> FMRIB Centre, Dept. of Clinical Neurology
> University of Oxford
> John Radcliffe Hospital
> Headley Way, Headington
> Oxford OX3 9DU
> Phone: 01865 222 494
> Email: [log in to unmask]
>
___________________________________
Katie Karlsgodt
Dept of Psychology/Cognitive Neuroscience
University of California, Los Angeles
[log in to unmask]
(310) 794-9673
|