hi - if you would like to put an example image on a web/ftp site, or email
me it directly, we can have a quick look. it sounds like you have tried
the right things - it may just be very small amounts left attached to the
brain, which may not greatly affect the final output from sienax, but i
can check that.
cheers, Steve.
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Jong Chul Youn wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I found some discussions about BET in the archives.
>
> I reviewed my MRI data and found no problems in scan quality.
>
> I tried to chnage -f option. But, some structures of eye ball mescles were
> still included.
>
> But, my MR data contain many portion of neck. Becaue some MRI films using
> same parameter and including small protion of neck were extracted
> beutifully, I think inclusion of neck can cause the problem.
>
> I tried to exclude below pons by avwroi utility. Much eye ball muscles
> were disappeared but stilll some eyeball muscles were remain. So I tried
> to change center point in command line.
>
> But, until now, I could not get successful results.
>
> Am I right? Is there any other method which can solve my problem? And, if
> I find optimal option, all these method can use sienax?
>
> Best regards.
>
> Jong-Chul, Youn M.D.
> Kunggi Provincial Hospital for the Elderly.
> Rep. of Korea
>
Stephen M. Smith DPhil
Associate Director, FMRIB and Analysis Research Coordinator
Oxford University Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain
John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
[log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
|