JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACCESSIBUILT Archives


ACCESSIBUILT Archives

ACCESSIBUILT Archives


ACCESSIBUILT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACCESSIBUILT Home

ACCESSIBUILT Home

ACCESSIBUILT  2004

ACCESSIBUILT 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: "K" Barriers

From:

Stewart McGough <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Accessibuilt list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:25:44 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (87 lines)

Anthony
Do you have a drawing of the installation.
My powers of visualisation have been overstretched.
Stewart McGough

-----Original Message-----
From: Accessibuilt list [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
Rylands Anthony
Sent: 12 October 2004 10:07
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: "K" Barriers


John,

They have been tested by the local Access Group in Sheffield at a meeting attended by the designer who lives locally.

Whilst the A barrier is used extensively in Sheffield it has its problems for some disabled people and the aim of the K barrier was in part to try to improve the accessibility.

The Group felt overall there were positive benefits of the new style in particular for visually impaired people. The A frame is not so good for them. However the K barrier poses some difficulty for manual wheelchair users. Also there was a question, not previously posed for the A frame, as to whether guide dogs would walk through the more enclosed space of the K barrier. This is to be checked.

The K barrier can be set at different widths so to a degree the problems can be overcome but its balanced against the likelihood of more motorcycles getting through. It has been agreed that the K barriers will be used, set at a width of 580 mm. A width of 550 mm was tested and found to have a significant detrimental impact on the accessibility of the barrier for wheelchair users.

The K barrier is easier to install for a number of reasons. Its construction is simpler but also in Sheffield the Council has insisted on using tactile guidance paving to help guide visually impaired people through it, following the Group's earlier comments.

The Sheffield Access Group meet on 13th October to confirm their final view on the K barriers so I will update you if there are any additional comments.

The barriers in both forms affect a range of people from buggy users to cyclists and disabled people. There are also a range of issues affecting their construction and attacks by vandals - using Stihl saws -  and off-road vehicles who try to rip them out. The Council has a lot of experience of the barriers in both forms so if anyone is interested please contact me.

Anthony Rylands
Sheffield City Council Access Officer for Disabled People
Tel: 0114 273 4197
Fax: 0114 273 5002
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Web: http://www.sheffield.gov.uk

 -----Original Message-----
From:   John Rainey [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:   11 October 2004 16:16
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        [ACCESSIBUILT] "K" Barriers

"K" Barriers - a further development of the "A" frame barrier. Does anyone
know how effective they are at keeping out motorcycles and how accessible
they are for wheelchaire users, double buggies etc.? I have also seen a
kissing gate with a RADAR lock. Both are a similar price but the first does
not require the user to be a RADAR key holder whereas the second does. I
know the kissing gate will allow a vehicle through in the unlocked and
extended position but I know little about the "K" gate.

John Rainey

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself with cool new emoticons http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/myemo

----------End of Message----------

Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:

http://www.inclusive-design.it

Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html

The information in this email is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee.  If you are not the addressee, please tell us by using the reply facility in your email software as soon as possible. Sheffield City Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network.  If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended please tell us as soon as possible.

----------End of Message----------

Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:

http://www.inclusive-design.it

Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html

This email has been virus scanned by the MessageLabs SkyScan service.

Please see our standard disclaimer at http://www.aedas.com/disclaimer.htm

This email has been virus scanned by the MessageLabs SkyScan service.

----------End of Message----------

Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:

http://www.inclusive-design.it

Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
January 2023
November 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager