On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 05:00:54AM +0200, Thomas Baker wrote:
> > In record 2 below there is a nice qualified DC interpretation of the record -
> >
> > Would you accept an application as conformant, which is aware of
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > <my:duration> --subPropertyOf--> <dct:extend>, and treats incoming
> > records by creating a qualified DC interpretation from those by trying to resolve
> > relations to DC Terms?
[snip]
> This is sounding like a bigger undertaking, but we wouldn't
> need to write a dissertation -- a paragraph or two describing
> the larger context (larger than just source records) and giving
> handles to its various parts so that we can be specific about
> _which parts_ are "Dublin Core" in a given situation could
> be helpful.
Developing any more formal notion of "conformance" for
the purposes of conformance testing would seem require
such a framework.
Tom
--
Dr. Thomas Baker [log in to unmask]
Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven mobile +49-160-9664-2129
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft work +49-30-8109-9027
53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-144-2352
Personal email: [log in to unmask]
|