If using MapInfo, and I assume all other GIS, a simple two field table
can be converted to map points quite easily. No scanning needed
Historic Environment Record Officer
>>> [log in to unmask] 03/09/2003 08:32:11 >>>
Yes, I'd expand that suggestion a bit more and suggest you run a
search on each NGR to accommodate any variance between unmatched NGRs
what might be the same site in your system. The trick is of course
the NGRs in digital format in the first place: probably best done
without messing around with scanning and OCR.
Dr Tyler Bell
Oxford ArchDigital Ltd.
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:32:19 +0100, Nick Boldrini
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hello folks
> any ideas on a good way to approach the following problem would be
> Over the eccentric development of our SMR I have been left with a
> of paper gazetteers of sites, without being able to easily tell if
> have/have not been digitised.
> I have a pile of them lurking beside me and need to think of a way
> dealing with them.
> The obvious way is to pick a random sample of them, bash in the NGR
> see if there is anything similar to the Gazetteer entry on the
> SMR. This is not a task I relish having better things to do with my
> (such as watching paint dry....), and would take a long time.
> So I am wondering if anyone can think of a better/quicker way to do
> I have thought of scanning the Gazetteers in, converting the NGR's
> Mapinfo table and running a find unmatched type query to see if any
> aren't overlapped by a monument. For those that are, I would pick a
> random sample to check that it is not another monument that by
> overlays them, but the one I would expect from the Gazetteer.
> Hopefully by doing this we'll be able to get an idea of whether we
> to go through one by one to check each record, or can be confident
> the data has been put in.
> Does anyone have any experience of trying anything like this
> etc) or can think of a better way?? Also, what would be a
> random sample to use to get a good idea of how many records
> digitised (whichever method I use), or that the overlaying monuments
> in fact the same ones?? 2% ?? 5%?? More ?? Less??
> Any ideas appreciated.
> thanks in advance
> best wishes
> Nick Boldrini
> SMR Computing Officer
> Heritage Unit
> North Yorkshire County Council
> Direct Dial (01609) 532331
> North Yorkshire County Council has the right and does inspect E-
> Government mails sent
> from and to its computer system.
> This E-mail and any attachments may contain information that is
> confidential or privileged, and is intended solely for the use of
> named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please be
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken is
> prohibited and may be unlawful.
> Any opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily
> view of the Council.
> North Yorkshire County Council.