I don't quite understand the reference to MODS below, but maybe it will be
obvious when I hear about the Creative Commons proposal. Or can anyone
enlighten me? In any case, I won't arrive until about 12:00 or so on
Sun. so if there is some discussion on MODS I'd appreciate it if it's
discussed when I get there.
Rebecca
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Thomas Baker wrote:
> -- I will try to bang out an agenda early tomorrow morning.
> If I do not succeed in doing this, one basic guideline:
> there will be four more participants on Sunday than on
> Saturday:
>
> -- Rebecca, who will be arriving circa 11am on Sunday.
> She will cover MARC Relators; as well as ISO1806 and
> AAT wrapup from Ithaca (which is tied to some encoding
> scheme issues). She is interested in the issue of
> structured values in particular because the DC-Lib AP
> has some, so I offered that DCMICite be discussed and
> voted on Sunday.
>
> -- Stu (who will be with the Trustees the day before), who
> wants to present and discuss several issues: a Creative
> Commons proposal he has been working on with Eric and
> Andy, and which will henceforth be shepherded by Andrew
> (who will also have some comments to make about, for
> example, related developments in MODS). Stu will also
> present a "Directorate view" on the issue of offering
> encoding scheme registration services. And he will
> perhaps represent Makx's (and my) ideas on a potential
> new member of the UB.
>
> -- Heike Neuroth of SUB Goettingen, who (among many other
> things) has been active in efforts to create a DCMI
> Affiliate in Germany.
>
> -- Jani Stenvall, who works with Juha Hakala in Helsinki.
>
> -- Makx will not be able to attend either day because he
> will be with the Trustees on Saturday and the Corporate
> Circle on Sunday.
>
> -- As Sunday is already starting to look pretty full, I suggest
> that the basic discussion of the Abstract Model take place
> on Saturday -- at least enough to get a rough idea of where
> UB members stand on the issues and which documents may need
> to be rewritten or merged. Somebody could perhaps provide
> on Sunday a summary of that discussion as preparation for
> the decision on DCMICite and the preliminary discussion
> of the Creative Commons proposal.
>
> -- One of the loose ends I will not be able to tie up is the
> Type proposal, which depends on putting into place
> an additional concept of "sub-class". I suggest that
> we discuss this in the context of the Abstract Model
> discussion on Saturday. I had hoped to draft a one- or
> two-sentence definition for approval in Seattle but won't
> even have time for that...
>
> -- I trust Stuart can circulate information about the meeting
> venue and about the dinner with the Trustees on Saturday.
>
> Enough for now; will post if I think of more...
>
> Tom
>
> --
> Dr. Thomas Baker [log in to unmask]
> Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven mobile +49-160-9664-2129
> Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft work +49-30-8109-9027
> 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-144-2352
> Personal email: [log in to unmask]
>
|