Tom wrote
>
> Providing a statement model as an overall frame could perhaps
> help avoid such confusion. Of course, that statement model
> would now maps much more completely onto the RDF model than
> the literal-value-based model of the D-Lib paper.
Some clarification i would like:
Do you think DCQ-RDF/XML is compliant with the model?
Do you think DCS-RDF/XML is compliant?
The abstract model stresses the role
of distributed knowledge basis -
Do you see a hidden problem at that point?
Do you want to have the abstract (!) model
for DC dependent (!) on RDF(S)?
Best regards,
rs
>
> Tom
>
> [1] http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october00/baker/10baker.html
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Thomas Baker [log in to unmask]
> Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven mobile +49-160-9664-2129
> Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft work +49-30-8109-9027
> 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-144-2352
> Personal email: [log in to unmask]
>
>
|