> -----Original Message-----
> The difference is that RDF schema cannot (by design) handle
> of properties as a "record"; there is simply no such concept in RDF
> schema. It only talks about the semantics of individual classes and
> properties, and their relations, not about aggregating them.
Please pardon my ignorance about RDF, but couldn't there be a (node)
called "record" with repeatable property "contains"?