JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for QUAL-SOFTWARE Archives


QUAL-SOFTWARE Archives

QUAL-SOFTWARE Archives


QUAL-SOFTWARE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

QUAL-SOFTWARE Home

QUAL-SOFTWARE Home

QUAL-SOFTWARE  August 2003

QUAL-SOFTWARE August 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

follow-up request for participants in study of examniers' views on qual analysis.

From:

Helen Marshall <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

qual-software <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:22:59 +1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (52 lines)

Dear colleagues
                       This email is a follow -up invitation to all those who have examined qualitative research theses (full theses or minor theses, postgraduate diploma, master's or doctoral level) to participate in a research project on the issue of recognizing good qualitative research.  If  you responded to my  earlier  request, or this is of no interest to you, accept my apologies for taking your time (especially for those who will get cross-postings). 

For those who would like to participate, the background of this project is as follows:

I have been wrestling in various ways with the starting question of what constitutes good analysis of qualitative data.  One of the difficulties is, of course, that 'good' means different things in different parts of the research world.  Health researchers will probably have some rules for goodness in common with cultural anthropologists and educational researchers, and some differences.

It dawned on me late one night (after writing an examiner's report) that people who examine theses must have articulated to themselves the rules and heuristics they use to evaluate research.  So if I can get examiners to spell out the characteristics that represent good data analysis I will get some answers my   starting question.

Here's what I am asking you to do:
1)      Reflect on the question what are the signs by which you recognize good qualitative data analysis when you examine a thesis?
2)       Email your answer to the discussion list before 30 September 2003.   Please add a note on:
     your discipline or specialization (e.g. 'sociology of health', 'evaluation research', etc) 
     the number of qualitative theses you have examined (as best you can recall it)
     what type of theses you have examined (e.g. 'all minor theses for coursework degrees or about 5 research PhDs and about 10 research Masters')


I think that a public discussion will create interesting synergies, and so encourage you to use the list rather than a reply to me direct, but if for some reason you prefer not to make a public response, please email me direct at [log in to unmask]

This research project has been approved by the Ethics committee of the faculty of The Constructed Environment, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology. Responding to the question about signs by which you recognize good analysis constitutes agreement to participate in the project. 

Here is what I will do with your data in the first instance:
I will copy all email responses, and edit them to remove your name and any identifying details except for your specialization and experience as examiner. Once the copy is made, I will delete the original email.  
 I will use NVIVO for data management.  I seek your   permission to quote from the text of your email in publications resulting from the project.  I undertake to post to the list a brief description of the findings of the project in October 2003. 

Data storage and later use
I will keep the NVIVO file for five years, and may use it during that time in teaching qualitative methods. I hope to include use material from the project from it in a monograph on qualitative data analysis, and to generate at least one conference paper from it.  Although your original responses are identifiable to the e-list like any other public communication, they will be anonymous in the context of my research project and any publications or teaching arising from it.  

I  thank those of you who have already participated, and apologize to those who will receive cross-postings.  I look forward very much to discussion around the question "what are the signs by which you recognize good qualitative data analysis when you examine a thesis?"

Yours sincerely
Helen Marshall 

Dr Helen Marshall
Senior Lecturer,
Coordinator  of context Curriculum 
School of Social Science and Planning
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology

phone 61+03+99253016
fax      61+03+99251087
email [log in to unmask]


Double click on www.rmit.edu.au/tce/ssp 
to visit the School of Social Science and Planning's Website

Or click http://www.rmit.edu.au/tce/ssp/socialscience/honours
to visit the honours program page

Or click www.rmit.edu.au/tce/ssp/ap/context
to visit the  CCpage

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager