Hello All
OAI Implementers who are not on the OAI-Implementers list might be
interested in the following message and the discussion which has followed
it. See http://oaisrv.nsdl.cornell.edu/mailman/listinfo/oai-implementers
for more.
Phil
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [OAI-implementers] Reconsidering mandatory DC in OAI-PMH
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:49:17 -0400
From: Carl Lagoze <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Dublin Core has been the mandated metadata format in OAI-PMH since the
initial release of the protocol. The purpose of this requirement was to
promote interoperability among data providers. It was the subject of
considerable discussion in the formulation of both the 1.0 and 2.0
specifications and we think that it is time to reexamine this
requirement in light of two factors:
1. There is increasing interest in using the protocol for applications
other than sharing metadata to promote resource discovery [1][2]. Dublin
Core is targeted mainly as metadata for resource discovery and is,
therefore, inappropriate for these other applications. It might make
sense to loosen the Dublin Core requirement to a recommendation, and
thus reduce any barrier to these broader applications.
2. The linkage between Dublin Core and OAI-PMH has been over-emphasized
at the expense of the utility of OAI-PMH for dissemination of richer,
and perhaps more useful, structured data. In some cases data providers
with richer metadata (e.g., MARC, IEEE LOM) have been forced by the
requirement to dumb-down rich metadata to Dublin Core and have then
failed to provide the original metadata. As a result, the community
looses the benefits of rich data and is left with the reduced semantics
of Dublin Core.
We need to choose between the competing goals of protocol stability and
generalization. Although removing the Dublin Core requirement would not
negatively impact existing or future data providers, it may impact
service providers whose applications depend on the existence of a
uniform metadata format.
We would like to open this subject for community discussion. While the
technical aspects of this change are minimal it does have considerable
political impact. Please give your feedback on the following proposal:
1. Change the Dublin Core requirement to a recommendation.
2. Leave oai_dc as a reserved metadataPrefix
3. Move the oai_dc part of protocol document to Implementation
Guidelines
We invite members of this list to contribute their thoughts on this.
[1] http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july03/young/07young.html
[2]
http://agenda.cern.ch/askArchive.php?base=agenda&categ=a02333&id=a02333s
5t5/transparencies
Carl Lagoze
Michael Nelson
Herbert Van de Sompel
Simeon Warner
_______________________________________________
OAI-implementers mailing list
List information, archives, preferences and to unsubscribe:
http://oaisrv.nsdl.cornell.edu/mailman/listinfo/oai-implementers
--
Phil Barker Learning Technology Adviser
ICBL, School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Mountbatten Building, Heriot-Watt University,
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS
Tel: 0131 451 3278 Fax: 0131 451 3327
Web: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/
|