JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED  August 2003

ACAD-AE-MED August 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Turn them around[Scanned By SOPHOS]

From:

Derek Sage <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Accident and Emergency Academic List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 18 Aug 2003 00:12:42 +1200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (290 lines)

If our triage nurse spots a case that is suitably treated in general
practice then the patient is assessed to see if it is safe for discharge
from the ED to occur and go to their GP (nurse assessment). Bearing in mind
we turnaround at triage between 3-10% per day we think that it works well.
It is accepted locally because of local press / cinema reminders to keep the
emergency departments for emergencies.
 I know that if I was in the UK, our department would see 15-20,000 more
category 4 and 5 patients than we do at present.
This is all the more fascinating when here a GP visit involves a charge and
ED does not!

Derek Sage
Tauranga NZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tudor Codreanu" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: Turn them around[Scanned By SOPHOS]


> It is one of those days.
>
> The problem is much more complicated. Changing mentalities is, if not
> utopic, unrealistic in one's lifetime. It may be true that one sent away
> from A&E will spread the gospel to another ten, but the converse is true
as
> well. One primary care satisfied customer treated in A&E will do the
same...
> I have spent 30 years of my life in a dictatorial system and I have seen
> many things I would not wish to share with my best enemies. However, my
> heart and soul melt when someone comes to A&E, having been seen by a GP,
but
> completely unsatisfied with what he was told or given. Only yesterday a 36
> years old very fit man appeared, after being seen by his doctor, with an
> extremely painful left knee when kneeling. Only by seeing the state of his
> boiler suit over his knees (discoloured fabric, thinner than a china
> parchment, with holes and dust marks) one's blitzdiagnose could have been
> made. I felt sorry for a moment for his doctor who obviously missed the
BBC
> series "living in the past" where a common sight was a number of maids
> dedicated in making those floorboards shining. This poor man was told that
> due to his oversporty and adventurous activities the bone in front of the
> knee is damaged and it is unfortunate that the nerve runs very closely to
> that bone, hence the pain. The GP felt sorry, as well, for the patient as
> "you are now getting old, and you have to put up with this". If I were to
be
> nasty I would say this doctor should not be allowed alone on the street.
But
> I am not.
>
> Now, who would have the heart to send him back to the (same?) GP? I
> couldn't.
>
> "...Bacteria. Trillions. Good and bad. I regularly top up my good
> bacteria.....Surely everybody knows that..." Doctors. Thousands. Good and
> bad. ... Surely everybody knows that... GP training (GPVTS scheme) lasts
for
> two years with specialties ranging from psychiatry to general medicine,
> passing through A&E, O&G, Paeds. Usually they are recruited immediately
> after university and their academic knowledge extends over the topics
> covered during those years. It was shown (although I have reservations in
> accepting it fully) that SHOs in A&E are not cleverer after 6 months spent
> in the department. Times four and they are not better at the end of their
> GPVTS. Scary! How likely it is for this trainee to see a prepatellar
> bursitis in his training? Almost nil. Meniscus tear, PFJ OA? More likely.
> Thus the attempted diagnosis. (The sad part is that he was not a juvenile
> GP.)
>
> As soon as you try to look at a patient as if it was part of your family
> your shields are dropping. What would you do if the only other open door
> that may get you the solution you desperately want has an A&E banner over
> it? Wouldn't you open it? No matter how inappropriate that may be? Oh yes
> you would. It is even worse if your kids are involved (two days ago: 9
> months old, precious child, known with eczema, develops rash over
buttocks.
> District nurse: "sunburn"(!?!). GP: "allergy". Grandma': "I want somebody
> else to have a look at him as he is my only grandchild and I received
> conflicting opinions." Surely the SHO did not refer that to the paeds! Oh
> yes he did! So, specialist opinion in 2 hours for a primary care patient?
> Yes yes yes! How about the gospel spread 30 minutes after discharge. Yes
yes
> yes, you guessed!
>
> Mail at two o'clock. "Dear Doctor, I wonder if you could see this man
> earlier than September. The injection you gave him for his trochanter
> bursitis worked very effectively last year. Unfortunately it seems that it
> is playing up again, and in effect, it is so painful that he can hardly
get
> out of his wheelchair now...". Why are we then moaning about 6 months
> waiting lists? If I were to be nasty again I would say this doctor should
> not be allowed alone on the street either. But I am not.
>
> Half decent night sleep.
>
> Tradition is good. Tradition preserves the past. Tradition attracts
tourists
> and money. That is the place for tradition. It has no role in medicine.
> Traditionally doctors were trained that way. Society evolved in another
> direction. Changing mentalities takes more that a generation (and life is
to
> short anyway to change your mentalities...). Mentalities are not changed
by
> us picking one here and one there of the inappropriates coming to A&E.
> Mentalities are changed by the front page of the newspapers: "Life saved
in
> A&E - X-ray discovers cancer! (woke up this morning with sore shoulder.
Came
> to A&E and Xrayed - inappropriate, against guidelines etc etc by
> inexperienced SHO. Sarcoma diagnosed). This is why we had 14 999
appearances
> last week with people stung by wasps - "I read about it in the paper!").
> This is what changes mentalities! There is an ever increasing number of
> patients coming to A&E. Fact. There are no more stones falling from he
skies
> to get them to us, but more rashes, allergies, shorter training period for
> students and doctors. Fact... A&E becomes a Mecca were problems are bound
to
> be solved. Because of the guidelines, NICE, SIGN, government, targets,
> inexperience, least resistance, cannot be bothered to argue, empathy... If
> we cannot change mentalities efficiently (look in a mirror and into your
> eyes, then think of a "mentality" somebody told you about that is
anachronic
> - this can range from how you hold your spoon to who should treat
cellulitis
> -), lets make Mecca a better place. For all of us. Before I forget, while
> you are looking at yourself in the mirror, be honest where would you
(prefer
> to) take your child if  unwell...
>
> Permanent GP in A&E (24/24) alongside A&E staff. One triage door, two
> directions for patients. One exit door. One pit stop. Initial cohabitation
> may prove less than a honeymoon but settling is the norm in short time.
The
> machiavellic added shade is that both are under permanent, untold,
scrutiny.
> It will take more guts and convincing, good medical practice, to
> cross-refer.
> One step further would be to consider east-european experience. The health
> system may be in shambles (equipment etc), but waiting lists are unheard
of.
> There is a place called "polyclinic". Ten storey high building. 200
doctors
> inside plus nurses etc. These doctors are consultants or senior
registrars,
> of all specialities. Some with permanent contracts. 9 to 5 job. Some
> on-calls at the nearby hospital (if so wished). Dermatologist,
> rheumatologists, orthopods, surgeons, cardiologists etc etc. 30 minutes
> slots per patient. You turn up at the door of the polyclinic, sent by GP
or
> self referral. You are given a number and you join the queue. Seen by
> specialist that day. If hospital needed ok, if home needed, ok again.
These
> polyclinics are present in cities, and attract many doctors who want/have
to
> stay in the area (family, spouse job etc). Probably more than 50% of the
> orthopaedic patients seen in hospital are discharged after just one
> appointment. Freeing operating time by such patients been seen in
> polyclinics makes waiting lists unknown of. And keeps primary care ones
out
> of hospitals as well. There are so many SHO's out there wanting to
> specialise but stuck in the bottleneck. We are all losing immensely by
> keeping these people dreams up for several years for them to become
> frustrated GPs as they cannot progress further (and they are not stupid!).
> They lose, we lose, the society loses.
>
> I am happy that this list exists.
>
> And while you had the mathusalemic patience to read,  my blown gasket has
> self repaired. I have stopped rattling and shall be quiet now, for a
while.
>
>
> Dr. Tudor Codreanu MSc(Med)
> Staff Grade
> Accident and Emergency Dept.
> Dr. Gray's Hospital
> Elgin
> tel: 01343 543131 ext 67360
> dir: 01343 567360
> fax: 01343 552612
> e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dunn Matthew Dr. (RJC) ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY - SwarkHosp-TR
> > [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: 13 August 2003 13:16
> > To:   [log in to unmask]
> > Subject:      Re: Turn them around[Scanned By SOPHOS]
> >
> > > > Our physicians have decided they will no longer take
> > > > patients with fractures unless the fracture is
> > > > secondary to a medical condition that needs sorting.
> > > > So simple falls with pubic ramus fractures in elderly
> > > > or patients with Colles fractures admitted because
> > > > they live alone and can't cope are being sent to
> > > > orthos now! I'm standing back to watch the fireworks!
> >
> > Fine as long as the orthos take them. Otherwise the patient and the A
and
> > E
> > department are caught between interdepartment pettiness.
> >
> > > Not
> > > only do they take
> > > pubic ramus fractures and colles fractures (clearly medical
> > > conditions!?)
> >
> > The other side of it is that pubic ramus fracture and Colles' fracture
are
> > outpatient conditions (unless Colles' fracture is in a patient
unsuitable
> > for day surgery). If the patient requires admission it is because of one
> > or
> > more medical conditions.
> > If you put a patient with undertreated or undiagnosed Parkinsons, small
> > PEs,
> > cardiac failure or hypovolaemia on an ortho ward they'll mobilise slower
> > than if admitted under a good general physician.
> >
> > > Pretty soon, I bet
> > > they'll be taking
> > > head injuries because the local surgeons aren't trained in
> > > the management of
> > > head injuries.
> >
> > I hope so. General physicians do seem the best placed (apart from
possibly
> > neurologists or neurosurgeons) to have the skills (experience in long
term
> > care of brain injury, experience in care of fits/ epilepsy, experience
of
> > proper observation medicine, diagnosis and treatment of non specific
> > neurological disorders, outpatient follow up) too look after head
injuries
> > not needing surgery. It always seemed that the admission under surgery
(or
> > A
> > and E as a branch of surgery) was based on historical precedence (the
> > single
> > surgeon doing everything) rather than the needs of the patient.
> >
> > > As a GP, I'd like to endorse your comments. I would be
> > > more than happy
> > > if my patients (inapropriately attending A&E) were diverted
> > > back to me.
> > > Those that do attend (in my experience) have done so of their
> > > own accord,
> > > often against GP advice.
> >
> > This accords with my experience. There are a lot of patients who say
they
> > were told to come by their GP or that their GP had no appointments with
> > whom
> > investigation reveals that the GP had free emergency slots that day. It
is
> > odd (but true) that some patients will come to A and E because their GP
> > won't visit.
> >
> > Redirecting patients to other health care providers is good medicine.
Can
> > generate a bit of bad feeling if done by the doctor after the patient
has
> > been waiting 6 hours (or 75 minutes in the new NHS), so ideally done
from
> > triage, but even if done by the doctor it is useful (public education: a
> > dissatisfied customer tells and average of 10 people. Use this to your
> > advantage). Use of a sensible triage nurse empowered to act
professionally
> > and discharge outside protocols is probably the best way forwards
> > (although
> > Stoke experimented with consultant triage and sent away about a third);
> > but
> > local adaptations of the Coventry guidance would be a pretty good start.
> > The
> > difficulty is in persuading staff that just because a patient comes to A
> > and
> > E you don't have to treat them.
> >
> > Matt Dunn
> > Warwick
> >
> >
> > This email has been scanned for viruses by NAI AVD however we are unable
> > to
> > accept responsibility for any damage caused by the contents.
> > The opinions expressed in this email represent the views of the sender,
> > not
> > South Warwickshire General Hospitals NHS Trust unless explicitly stated.
> > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
September 2022
July 2022
February 2022
January 2022
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
September 2019
March 2019
April 2018
January 2018
November 2017
May 2017
March 2017
November 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager