Alastair Millar wrote:
> andrew rice writes...
>> You will of course know the regulations regarding a complaint
>> against an RAO presumes the innocence of the organisation
>> in question, [snip]
> Er, well yes, it would, wouldn't it? "Innocent until proven guilty" is a
> fairly well-established premise...
Yes, but he may mean that a "beyond reasonable doubt" standard of proof is
required, rather than the civil "balance of probabilities" standard which
obtains in disciplinary cases.