Hi Richard, your last post was a bit of an eye opener for me. I'm not a
detectorist myself and my assumption has always been that the official clubs
did things properly and the main culprits were privateers - People whose
primary mission is theft of archaeology, and that metal detectors are just
one tool that they may use as part of their theft. Any chance of
enlightening us with who these clubs are? you can reply off list if you
like, I don't want to get into any legal wrangles, I just think there are
some of us who'd like to ask these clubs what their policy is, and if
they've ever done such a thing.
I still think, however, that a person does not become a thief just by owning
a metal detector, and that archaeological groups and societies should be
bringing these people "in house".
If you want a real target to complain about, try searching the BBC's web
site for metal detectors, and treasure, I seem to recall they think it's
From: British archaeology discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Richard Tyndall
Sent: 17 July 2003 19:50
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: private collecting by archaeologists: was in praise of
metal detecting: was (no subject) private collections
I cannot for a moment agree that private collections are better. There are
a lot of faults with the public provision of archaeological services and
access can sometimes be difficult but at least there is an effort to
provide context and location information. I am aware of at least a dozen
private collections in the Newark area compiled by metal detectorists, one
of which was, in part, put up for auction a couple of years ago. All this
material has been stripped from sites in the area over the last 30 or 40
years and there is almost no infomation on where it was obtained. Of those
dozen collectors only one has been willing to provide any access for
More insidious than even this is the habit of metal detectorists of
stripping fields of non metal objects which might indicate the presence of
a site. We have come across two sites in the last 4 years (one roman and
one medieval) where the detectorists collected all the pottery as they
searched the field and then dumped in in nearby hedges when they were done.
In one case where we managed to talk to the detectorists without them
knowing who we were they said that this was done specifically so that other
people coming on to the site later would not know there was anything there.
And just to emphasise, in both the cases mentioned above the detectorists
were official clubs who had paid the land owners for rights to detect on
However detectorists keep their collections almost all of them are
destroying archaeological eveidence either conciously or unconciously and
something (though what I admit I don't know) must be done to stop them.
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.501 / Virus Database: 299 - Release Date: 14/07/03