Paul Barford <[log in to unmask]> wrote (in <00ed01c33731$a3c7a080$200
863d9@Standard>) about 'Big Dig', on Fri, 20 Jun 2003:
>So it would seem that a letter was being sent out well over a year ago.
It seems that it did not go to anywhere near enough people in the
BRITARCH community. It would have been enlightened for TT to ask the
list owner to put their letter to the whole mailgroup.
>Hal's message generated a relatively large response, some of which
>concentrated on how much the archaeologists would get paid to do this work
>(versus the "money C4 would make out of it") and so on.
A natural reaction, but not one to create warm feelings between TT and
the experts. In such a case, again, if TT had contacted BRITARCH, the
question of modest honoraria might have been discussed. Even TT couldn't
get large fees past its bean-counters.
>Some of the
>correspondence concerned whether mere undergraduates would be able to
>fulfill this role.
I suppose some would, but many would not. That was my experience at that
time of life: some of my cohort were reasonably competent and reliable,
but far from all.
> I raised the problem of
>the potential public perception of the archaeological community as
>obstructive rather than supportive, which seems to have happened.
That is how it has appeared to me, too.
> I think also
>though that even if its not a good way to achieve an aim, its potential is
>still worth exploiting rather than simply dismissing it.
Agreed; the pursuit of the excellent often results in the loss of the
>Nobody (as far as I can see) has drawn attention to the online discussion
>which took place yesterday:
>[log in to unmask]@.4a914826/0" target="_blank">http:[log in to unmask]@.4a914826/0
>which made a number of good points (to in some cases some rather silly
>questions, and at least one archaeological sceptic).
Well, I didn't know about it. I'll see if it's still available.
> Whatever one thinks about the Big
>Dig, surely its a useful alternative to the "go and buy a metal detector and
>see what goodies you can find" approach to the past. I would have hoped that
>whatever our initial reaction, we could find ways to build upon the results
>of the Big Dig.
I hope so too. Maybe TT will decide that another series IS justified,
and will run another BD next year, with better preparation and many
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!