JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EAST-WEST-RESEARCH Archives


EAST-WEST-RESEARCH Archives

EAST-WEST-RESEARCH Archives


EAST-WEST-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EAST-WEST-RESEARCH Home

EAST-WEST-RESEARCH Home

EAST-WEST-RESEARCH  May 2003

EAST-WEST-RESEARCH May 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Who'll Poop St Pete Party? (Felgenhauer)

From:

Andrew Jameson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Andrew Jameson <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 8 May 2003 10:39:27 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (94 lines)

Johnson's Russia List
#7172
8 May 2003
[log in to unmask]
A CDI Project
www.cdi.org

#11
Moscow Times
May 8, 2003
Who'll Poop St. Pete Party?
By Pavel Felgenhauer

In a few weeks, U.S. President George W. Bush and other world leaders will be
in St. Petersburg to meet President Vladimir Putin at an informal summit to
celebrate the 300th anniversary of the founding of the city by Peter the
Great. Peter made St. Petersburg the capital of Russia in an attempt to link
his mostly Asian empire to Europe. But the task of Westernizing Russia has
never been completed.

Putin was obviously intending to use the coming summit to demonstrate the
exceptional progress that has been achieved under his leadership in finding
Russia a place in the Western community of nations. Hundreds of millions of
dollars were siphoned out of the federal budget to renovate the streets and
old imperial palaces in St. Petersburg to make the summit a success. But the
Iraq crisis may have ruined it all.

The short working visit to Moscow by British Prime Minister Tony Blair last
week was expected to close the gap between Putin and the Anglo-American
coalition. But there was, it seems, no serious progress.

Washington and London want a swift removal of the UN sanctions imposed on
Iraq in 1990. A removal of sanctions may facilitate a resumption of oil
exports at full prewar capacity, an influx of much needed investment, a quick
rebuilding of the shattered economy and further oil production growth.

For Russia -- and other oil exporters -- the prospect of fast oil production
growth in Iraq is bad news: Not only would world oil prices be depressed, but
investment that could go to our oil industry might be diverted. To prevent
such a scenario, Putin insisted that sanctions be removed only after UN
inspectors, operating in Iraq under the protection of UN peacekeepers and
independent of the U.S.-led allies, officially verify the liquidation of all
weapons of mass destruction -- a process that may last a year or two.

In the meantime, the UN-controlled oil-for-food program should continue in
Iraq. This program provides the population with basic food and medicine, but
does not allow any substantial investments in Iraq -- so keeping oil
production at a relatively low level. After talks with Blair, Putin told
journalists: "Russia is ready to support the UN inspectors in Iraq most
actively."

Putin was implying that Moscow is ready to send its soldiers into Iraq to
protect the UN inspectors from the U.S. military. The idea of deploying
French and Russian troops in Iraq under a UN flag to support inspections and
prevent a U.S.-led invasion was seriously discussed in Moscow and Paris
before the war. Even after it began, the idea was not abandoned: It was
assumed in Moscow that a Russian-led peacekeeping force could help separate
the opposing armies and impose a ceasefire when the U.S.-led coalition got
bogged down.

Of course, events in Iraq destroyed the anti-U.S. narratives of the Russian
elite. But why doesn't Putin change his policies correspondingly?

After the summer of 2001 and especially after Sept. 11, 2001, the Kremlin did
not use the term "multipolar world" at all. Now Putin is stating time and
again: Russia believes the world should be multipolar.

French President Jacques Chirac has recently also been publicly insisting
that a multipolar world with various centers of power that would contain U.S.
global hegemony is inevitable. In Moscow, where the former Prime Minister
Yevgeny Primakov first came up with the concept, French support is seen as
evidence of an impending collapse of U.S. supremacy.

The Foreign and Defense ministries, and the intelligence community that
predicted the United States would get a bloody nose in Iraq, are today trying
to cover up their blunder with new predictions that the war in Iraq is only
beginning, and that the wicked Americans may still be defeated.

In several weeks, the United States will be ready to resume oil exports from
Iraq and will demand that the UN lift sanctions. If Russia, France and others
block the sanctions lifting in the Security Council, the oil exports will
still go ahead regardless, just as the invasion did in March. Putin will be
forced to make a crucial decision: To follow the multipolar dream and face
mounting U.S. hostility, or perform a humiliating backtrack and face the
hostility of the majority of the Russian elite.

Maybe the St. Petersburg extravaganza will help: Putin would hate to spoil
the show in his hometown. The Kremlin may accept the inevitable and hope that
a victorious Bush will be merciful.

Pavel Felgenhauer is an independent defense analyst.

********

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager