JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SPORT-MED Archives


SPORT-MED Archives

SPORT-MED Archives


SPORT-MED@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SPORT-MED Home

SPORT-MED Home

SPORT-MED  March 2003

SPORT-MED March 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

NY Times: 'Race' is not just a 'social construct'

From:

Jon Entine <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

To support research in sports medicine <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:25:40 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (132 lines)

New York Times

March 20, 2003

2 Scholarly Articles Diverge on Role of Race in Medicine
By NICHOLAS WADE

Responding to recent advances in decoding DNA that have thrown light into a
murky corner of genetics, two articles in The New England Journal of
Medicine today take different views on whether race is a meaningful factor
in medicine.

In addition, a staff-written commentary suggests that the journal's own view
on the subject may have softened in the two years since it ran an editorial
attacking "the fallacy of race as a scientific concept."

The issue of race and medicine arises because certain diseases are more
common in some ethnic groups than others. One well-known instance is sickle
cell anemia, most prevalent in Africans, and another is Tay-Sachs, more
common among Jews. 

A view widespread among many social scientists, endorsed in official
statements by the American Sociological Association and the American
Anthropological Association, is that race is not a valid biological concept.
But biologists, particularly the population geneticists who study genetic
variation, have found that there is a structure in the human population. The
structure is a family tree showing separate branches for Africans,
Caucasians (Europe, the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent), East
Asians, Pacific Islanders and American Indians.

Biologists, too, have often been reluctant to use the term "race." But this
taboo was broken last year by Dr. Neil Risch, a leading population
geneticist at Stanford University.

Vexed by an editorial in The New England Journal that declared that race was
"biologically meaningless," Dr. Risch argued in the electronic journal
Genome Biology that self-identified race was useful in understanding ethnic
differences in disease and in the response to drugs.

Race corresponded broadly to continental ancestry and hence to the branches
on the human family tree described by geneticists, he said.

Expanding this argument today, Dr. Risch and nine co-authors say that
ignoring race will "retard progress in biomedical research."

Racial differences have arisen, they say, because after the ancestral human
population in Africa spread throughout the world 40,000 years ago,
geographical barriers prevented interbreeding. On each continent, under the
influence of natural selection and the random change between generations
known as genetic drift, people would have diverged away from the common
ancestral population, creating the major races. Within each race, religious,
cultural and geographical barriers fostered other endogamous, or inbreeding,
populations that led to the ethnic groups.

These divisions in the human population, though very slight in comparison
with the genetic variation inherited in common from the ancestral
population, can be important in understanding many diseases, Dr. Risch says.
Many rare diseases are often specific to single ethnic groups because of a
founder effect: They were present in the founder and became more noticeable
as the group, while remaining endogamous, grew in number. Many such diseases
are known among such well-studied groups as Ashkenazi Jews, French Canadians
and the Amish. 

Common diseases are found worldwide. But though much less is known about
them, they may be caused by different genes in different racial groups, Dr.
Risch says. In Caucasians, mutations in a gene called CARD15 make a person
susceptible to Crohn's disease, but Japanese with Crohn's disease have none
of these mutations. Presumably a different gene, yet to be found,
contributes to Crohn's in Japanese.

"It may be tempting to abandon the notion of race altogether," Dr. Risch and
his colleagues write, especially if attention to racial differences should
perpetuate discrepancies, but because of the leading clues provided by race
to the cause and treatment of disease, such a course "would be detrimental
to the very populations and persons that this approach allegedly seeks to
protect."

An opposing article by Dr. Richard S. Cooper, of the Loyola Stritch School
of Medicine in Maywood, Ill., is more skeptical. Doctors have been too
quick, Dr. Cooper and his co-authors write, to suggest genetics as the
reason for the greater susceptibility of African-Americans to certain
diseases, when the true reason may be social factors.

Dr. Cooper, an expert in the epidemiology of heart disease, agrees that some
rare diseases are particular to certain populations, but he says the genetic
variants that underlie common diseases are not.

"We can expect genomics increasingly to negate the old-fashioned concept
that differences in genetic susceptibilities to common diseases are racially
distributed," he says. For example APOE4, a genetic variant that contributes
to Alzheimer's disease, is found in all populations, he writes.

But even with APOE4, Dr. Risch says, knowledge of racial background provides
important insights because the risk conferred by the gene varies by race.
Inheriting two APOE4 genes, one from each parent, raises the risk of
Alzheimer's 33 times in Japanese populations, 15 times in Caucasians and
only 6 times in Africans. This suggests that some unknown factor modifies
the effect of the APOE4 gene in different races, he says.

Dr. Cooper is also concerned that if medical geneticists were to prove that
race is a valid biological concept, then social and political aspects of
race, some not so benign, might also seem to be validated.

"Race already has a meaning," he writes. "To invoke the authority of genomic
science in the debate over the value of race as a category of nature is to
accept the social meaning as well."

Two years ago an editorial by Robert S. Schwartz, deputy editor of The New
England Journal, dismissed the idea of race as a scientific concept. But in
today's issue another deputy editor, Elizabeth G. Phimister, says only that
it "remains to be seen" whether continental-based racial definitions will
help track the variant genes that cause common diseases.

Dr. Phimister concludes that it would be "unwise to abandon the practice of
recording race when we have barely begun to understand the architecture of
the human genome" and its clues to the genetic basis of disease.

She said in an e-mail message, however, that an editorial in the journal
"conveys the views of the author only, rather than views germane to journal
policy."

Dr. Risch said in an interview that anxiety about the genome and race might
have arisen among minorities who did not always feel in control of their own
genetic information. Despite initial fears of discrimination, he said, Jews
had taken charge of the information about diseases more common in Ashkenazis
and now accepted its usefulness.

"The more minorities we can get doing the research, the more these issues
will dissipate," he said.

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2020
February 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
April 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
May 2008
February 2008
November 2007
October 2007
August 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager