> Does the Registry application also need to know "Status"?
> I believe you had considered using dc:relation
> together with an identifier for a type of status (e.g.
> I was going to propose that the Usage Board declare a term
> dcu:status for this purpose -- but not today!
> It seems like "dc:title dc:relation http://...#recommended"
> would work as a stopgap measure, though it is awfully vague.
> Perhaps members of this list have a better suggestion?
Being able to provide term status in the registry would be nice, but is not
required. I would prefer to see 'hasStatus' added as a refinement to
dc:relation than to define it as a generic relation, or as a term in the dcu
(?) schema. Is this something the UB will consider? Also, can you
elaborate on what the dcu schema is and what it will define? Thanks.