> > My point was simply that an application should not need to be this
> > intelligent... encoded text should use a Datatype, and the
> > can be made to understand relevant datatypes.
> Do you mean an RDF datatype or DC encoding scheme? I'm curious what
> you've done since there are multiple ways to do this and it would be
> good to know from experience what works.
I think the key phrase here is "should use a Datatype", and I agree they
should. Unfortunately, more often that not, they do not. We plan to remove
the xml:lang attribute for the literals that are not naural-language text.
There is a simple workaround for the registry.