On Wed 12-Mar-2003 at 05:12:50PM +0100, Thomas Baker wrote:
> The modeling issue is whether it makes sense to qualify the
> literal "2003-03-12" with "en-US", and Jon seems to confirm what I
> had suspected -- that it doesn't really "make sense"...
My fear would be that it might give the impression that the
following is OK and that these are the same date...
I realise that we (the people on this list) won't get confused about
this (we all know that only W3CDTF dates are valid) but other people
might get the impression that the xml:lang attribute makes a
difference to the date format...
Chris Croome <[log in to unmask]>
web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/
web content management http://mkdoc.com/
everything else http://chris.croome.net/