Tom,
> Does the Registry application also need to know "Status"?
>
> I believe you had considered using dc:relation
> together with an identifier for a type of status (e.g.
> http://dublincore.org/usage/documents/process/#recommended).
>
> I was going to propose that the Usage Board declare a term
> dcu:status for this purpose -- but not today!
>
> It seems like "dc:title dc:relation http://...#recommended"
> would work as a stopgap measure, though it is awfully vague.
> Perhaps members of this list have a better suggestion?
Being able to provide term status in the registry would be nice, but is not
required. I would prefer to see 'hasStatus' added as a refinement to
dc:relation than to define it as a generic relation, or as a term in the dcu
(?) schema. Is this something the UB will consider? Also, can you
elaborate on what the dcu schema is and what it will define? Thanks.
Regards... harry
|