JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for HERFORUM Archives


HERFORUM Archives

HERFORUM Archives


HERFORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HERFORUM Home

HERFORUM Home

HERFORUM  February 2003

HERFORUM February 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Digital Historic OS maps - Advice wanted

From:

"Bishop, Hal" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Issues related to Sites & Monuments Records <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 11:37:41 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (134 lines)

Pete
For a comprehensive bibliography of OS maps, revisions etc., Richard
Oliver's Ordnance Survey Maps: A Concise Guide For Historians (Pub. the
Charles Close Society for the Study of OS Maps) 1993, reprint with corrs.
1994, will help in 98% of cases. The Survey's history of Lancaster's mapping
from 1845 is covered on p. 99; for Lancashire, equally useful, from 1838 see
p. 148.

Hal Bishop
Archaeology Officer
Torbay Council
01803-207788

        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Iles, Peter [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
        Sent:   Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:18 AM
        To:     [log in to unmask]
        Subject:        Re: Digital Historic OS maps - Advice wanted

        Digital Historic OS maps - There is a better way than Landmark Ltd
in our
        experience, but it might not be classed as 'cheaper', but it depends
on what
        you want.

        Problems with the Landmark data include 

        1) that they have cut up and tiled the original sheets to 5km x 5km
squares,
        equivalent to the 1:10,000 'quarter sheets' and on any one of these
tiles
        you may have sections of one, two or four original maps with
different
        publication and survey dates - it also make referencing back to the
original
        map a real pain.  

        2) They have also been scanned from the OS holdings of these maps,
WHICH ARE
        NOT NECESSARILY THE FIRST VERSION OF THE MAPS PRODUCED AND MAY BE
REVISED
        MAPS PRODUCED 20-40 YEARS AFTER THE QUOTED 'PUBLICATION' DATE.
Sorry to
        shout there but I've tried to get them to acknowledge this problem
on their
        'oldmaps' web site and to let people know about this - it can be
very
        misleading.  The changes to the maps were generally things like
railways and
        properties immediately adjacent to the Rwy such as mills, but I have
also
        found other changes but the important point is that it is not
usually noted
        on the map that it is a revised version. To look at this try their
'oldmaps'
        site and look at Lancaster city centre and then compare it with the
same
        area on our website http://mario.lancashire.gov.uk which is a
web-based GIS
        and has the 'real' first ed. 1:10,560 and some 1:2,500 maps on it -
you will
        spot a number of extra railways built in the 1850's on the 'oldmaps'
image,
        even though they claim a publication date of 1848! They claim that
as this
        date is on the map, then that is they date they should quote,
despite it
        being 'wrong'.  The revised maps are referred to as 'first state',
'second
        state', etc. and as far as I know, no one has produced a
comprehensive
        bibliography of these - please let me know if you know different.

        3) The image quality is very variable, in some places they are
unreadably
        black, in others so light that most lines have dropped out

        4) They are only available as monochrome images.

        5) The licence agreement is very restrictive

        Solutions - don't buy from Landmark, digitise your own!
        We borrowed a set of the 1:10,560 first edition sheets and a
selection of
        1:2,500 first edition sheets (in batches) from our County Record
Office,
        carefully selecting the cleanest copy and checking for the revision
problem
        mentioned above and asked a commercial company to scan them and
rectify them
        to the modern OS grid for us.  They were then supplied as 400dpi
monochrome
        images (TIF) and 200dpi greyscale images (JPG) on CD-Rom with the
        appropriate GIS world files.  Cost was £90 per sheet, but they would
produce
        the mono-only sheets for £60.  You could get them scanned a lot
cheaper than
        this, it is the processing and rectification that takes time and
money, but
        if you have the time/equipment/software you can do it yourself -
Erdas
        Imagine is the software of choice for this but it's not a trivial
job.  As
        far as we understand the digital maps are then your copyright, to
        use/distribute/display/sell as you want. 

        If you want the name of the firm that did our maps, or to chat about
it
        more, email me on [log in to unmask]


        Pete Iles, Lancs SMR






        ********************
        This e-mail contains information intended for the addressee only.
        It may be confidential and may be the subject of legal and/or
professional privilege. 
        If you are not the addressee you are not authorised to disseminate,
distribute, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment to it
        The content may be personal or contain personal opinions and unless
specifically stated or followed up in writing, the content cannot be taken
to form a contract or to be an expression of the County Council's position.
        LCC reserves the right to monitor all incoming and outgoing email
        LCC has taken reasonable steps to ensure that outgoing
communications do not contain  malicious software and it is your
responsibility to carry out any checks on this email before accepting the
email and opening attachments.
        ********************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager