The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  February 2003

DISABILITY-RESEARCH February 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: learning disability or difficulty?

From:

Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:40:22 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (97 lines)

Once again I suppose it hinges on whether yo see disabled as a noun,
something which is individual to one, or as the past tense of a verb, a
status which is ascribed to one.

difficulty is neutral, although entirely relative,

I for instance have difficulties in lerning certain things because of my
cognitive set up, it is a disability in so far as I am prevented from taking
up work which requires me to pass a test of number, it is in everday life
more of an inconvenience when I am out shopping, but entirely invisible to
the shopkeepers (thank goodness) else I would be in danger of there taking
advantage and short changing me, in which case it would be a disability
again.

The same can be said for any physical condition too, I don't want to get
back into the old arguments about impairment, but to me, impairment only
relates to a difficulty in achieiving something one desires to do.

I don't want to be an astronaut, so there is nothing impairing me from that.

Most people though do not think that deeply about the meaning of words,
because words do not occupy the same relationship to there lives as they do
to me.

Of course there are also those who would, taking there model from the DSM IV
refer to lerning disorders, indeed there are several of them in DSM IV which
in the UK part of the English speaking world tend to be agregated under
Greek periphrasis.

Notwithstanding the fact that it is helpful to understand as well as the
etymology of a word its actual historical shifts in meaning, being as
lerning disability originated as a term in the 1940's as an alternative to
Dyslexia, which was disliked for whatever reason.

However in the UK it has come to be a phrase that replaced Mental Handicap,
when the word Handicap fell from favour, and refers to what is still called
Retardation in the US. however I recall from my childhood that REtardation
is nothing less than a latinisation of backward or slow.

In the UK the term refers in the most part to people with an IQ (and I hate
IQ as a measure of anything) sometimes below 80 sometimes below 70 (it is
not consistant at all) also it can apply to a person of a higher IQ if they
have significant cognitive impairments in spite of an average or above IQ,

Words are never simple, they never mean one thing, they mean what the
originator of the message means by it until they reach the ears or eyes of
someone else, and then no two people seem to be able to extract the same
message from them.

Larry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Disability-Research Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Sara Ryan
> Sent: 24 February 2003 10:55
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: learning disability or difficulty?
>
>
> Hi,
> I found the discussions about disabled people/pwd really helpful
> and wondered what the arguments were for learning disability as
> opposed to learning difficulty (or vice versa).
>
> Should I stop there or open myself to critisms by rambling on a
> bit?!Does the term learning difficulty imply that the 'problem'
> is located within that person and therefore isn't a social
> construction or does it suggest that there is a continuum of
> learning 'ability' that everyone is on?
>
> If you have a learning disability why aren't you learning
> disabled or don't the arguments in favour of disabled person as
> opposed to pwd apply in the case of learning disabilities?
> And if they don't doesn't this underline the tensions within the
> social model about impairment?
>
> Please, please be gentle with any responses.... and thanks!
> Sara
>
> ________________End of message______________________
>
> Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
> are now located at:
>
> www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
>
> You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
>

________________End of message______________________

Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:

www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html

You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager