JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Archives


RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Archives

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Archives


RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Home

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Home

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK  February 2003

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK February 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: NHS Records management policy/strategy

From:

"Marsh, Mike" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The UK Records Management mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:33:39 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (109 lines)

Libby,

Sadly you are right. It is common knowledge (it is even referred to in the circular) that the Audit Commission and others regularly criticised the poor standard of record-keeping, especially of patient-related medical/clinical records. They highlighted lots of issues, and wrong-doers including doctors and consultants. In my experience administrative records (Finance, HR, Purchasing, Estates, etc) are generally fairly well kept, whilst they are 'active'; but retention schedules are not always applied correctly; and their archival storage often leaves a lot to be desired...horror stories of cellars, attics, and even mortuaries being (mis-)used for storage.

In the mid-late 1990s the Secretary of State for Health used to be regularly asked for updates on progress towards improvements. Parliamentary Questions  were often tabled, sometimes about individual patients. More recent events (also involving record-keeping failures by Social Services) have been reported in the Press. So, whilst there are undoubtedly good examples, there are still too many bad ones. Of course, the consequences for the patient could be dire, so the imperative to put things right should be more highly prioritised.

These were all drivers for the production of the circular. Of course, there had been earlier circulars eg: The oft quoted HC(89)20 was issued in 1989 and replaced earlier ones dating back to the 1960s, so generations of NHS Managers and staff have no excuses! As in any organisation, central policies are not always adhered to locally...and, as you said, no matter how good the guidelines are, they must be implemented, compliance monitored, and remedial action taken. But that takes resources and commitment. Local managers sometimes have to be convinced of the need, and of the business (or personal career) benefits. That is why today's RMs need to have inter-personal, communication, presentational, project-management, and other skills in addition to their professional knowledge and expertise.

Things are improving: To their credit, the DH and NHS Executive have been pro-active in publicising the circular, and in co-producing training courses and other events; and the Departmental Records Officer's team have (for many years) been offering excellent practical advice on a regular basis. And the NHS Executive has (re-)launched its electronic patient record strategy (possibly some wrong-doers had been waiting for electronic records to replace paper ones, and to remove their problem?). And many hospitals really do 'manage' their records properly.

But there is undoubtedly still lots of scope for improvement, especially in under-resourced areas. In theory the NHS is no different than any other 'business' - but, in practice, its unique culture and mix of professions, and the fact that it doesn't (really) have to turn a profit mean that it therefore lacks incentives to prioritise RM make it different. But the big issues and solutions are all the same. 

Perhaps a group of us should set up as RM consultants specialising in working with the NHS? I don't think we would ever be short of work!

Best regards, and good luck! Mike (Marsh).

-----Original Message-----
From: Libby Adams [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: mercredi, 19. février 2003 15:37
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: NHS Records management policy/strategy


I would like to add a personal note here, to say that although the 'For The
Record' circular is excellent and although it may have been sent to NHS
Trusts, it doesn't necessarily mean that it's been implemented. In my
(limited) experience, records management in the NHS often extends at the
most to medical records, while there is little or no management of the
administrative records. This is changing in some Trusts, but not in others
and highlights that along with a policy there is often a need for training
and enforcement to ensure that it is actually implemented and that
professionals are employed to lead on it.

Just a few thoughts of my own...

Libby Adams
Archivist, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust



> ----------
> From:         Marsh, Mike[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Reply To:     The UK Records Management mailing list
> Sent:         19 February 2003 12:06
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: NHS Records management policy/strategy
> 
> Hi Tony,
> 
> When I was with the Department of Health I co-authored a revised circular
> (HSC 1999-053)which was issued to all NHS Trusts. See the DoH / NHS
> Executive website at www.doh.gov.uk/nhsexec/manrec.htm - or look under
> COIN (Circulars on the Internet), under Records Management. Or speak to
> Steve Wells (DH DRO, based in Skipton House, London) or his DH DRO team in
> Premier Buildings, in Nelson (Lancashire). Also contact Lorraine Nicholson
> at Manchester University, or any member of IHRIM (Institute of Health
> Records & Information Management). They regularly run seminars for NHS
> staff, about NHS & Health RM Strategies. The RMs (Medical Records/Library)
> at most large NHS Trusts are members of IHRIM. If you get stuck, give me a
> call and I will provide introductions.
> 
> Regards, Mike (Marsh).
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony May [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: mercredi, 19. février 2003 12:52
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: NHS Records management policy/strategy
> 
> 
> Hi
> Does anyone have or know of anyone in the NHS who has developed either a
> RM
> policy or strategy. If so can you pass their details onto me or if you
> have
> one or both of these yourself could you pass them on to me direct.
> Thanks
> Tony May
> Documents Manager
> Hertfordshire County Council
> Phone: 01992 556 729
> Comnet 26729
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************************************
> The information in this message should be regarded as
> confidential and is intended for the addressee only unless
> explicitly stated. If you have received this message in error
> it must be deleted and the sender notified. The views
> expressed in this message are personal and not necessarily
> those of Hertfordshire County Council unless explicitly
> stated. Please be aware that emails sent to or received
> from Hertfordshire County Council may be intercepted and
> read by the Council. Interception will only occur to ensure
> compliance with Council policies or procedures or
> regulatory obligations, to prevent or deter crime, or for the
> purposes of essential maintenance or support of the email
> system.
> **********************************************************************
> 


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted in it are confidential and intended solely for the person or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you have received this email in error please notify the UCLH Mail Administrator at [log in to unmask]
This footnote confirms that the email and attachments contained no viruses when they left UCLH.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager