> From [log in to unmask] Tue Jan 14 13:48 MET 2003
> X-RAL-MFrom: <[log in to unmask]>
> X-RAL-Connect: <pat.bath.ac.uk [138.38.32.2]>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
> Importance: Normal
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:51:30 -0000
> From: Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy revisited
> To: [log in to unmask]
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0
> tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
> version=2.43
>
> On a related note...
>
> Roland,
>
> Did you get any further information on your question
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Nov/0255.html
>
> acknowledged at
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Nov/0260.html
>
> Or is this not explicit in the recent RDF drafts?
A related wording you may find at
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#xtocid103660
The keywords in this context seem "assume" and "presume" -
One could do with a 404 or 403 response on a http request on
a URI, which happens to be used as XML namespace in RDF/XML.
I can imagine applications for such a procedure - but
DC is not of that type - or?
rs
>
> Pete
>
>
|