The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  January 2003

DISABILITY-RESEARCH January 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: [danmail] Re: Your business with the Disability Rights Commission: Mr Colin Revell

From:

ColRevs <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ColRevs <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 19 Jan 2003 23:10:40 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (325 lines)

Dear Adrian Wyhatt

I would like to thank you from the bottom of my heart for your support and
intervention in my case. Your Granddad sounds like a cool and honest guy who
had a lot of love and time for others. I think you have your Granddad's
spirit.

Thank- you
An Ally to FREEOURPEOPLE

Colin Revell

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Whyatt" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>; "Mark Shrimpton" <[log in to unmask]>;
<[log in to unmask]>; <[log in to unmask]>;
<[log in to unmask]>; "Dave Barber" <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [danmail] Re: Your business with the Disability Rights
Commission: Mr Colin Revell


> Dear Mr Shrimpton
>
> Whilst I appreciate that you handle over 100,000 calls
> a year and that you can ill afford to spend too much
> time on any one case, it is all too obvious that your
> organisation is not representative of the NEURODIVERSE
> MAJORITY AMONGST DISABLED PEOPLE.
>
> You need to examine thoroughly how your procedures
> affect neurodiverse people and how to provide them
> with a proper and efficient service.
>
> Last year as a member of the Civil Service Disability
> Network I saw a DRC video on disability which had
> apparently won awards.
>
> Though up to 40% of the population and rising have
> some form of neurodiversity (Dyslexia, Dyscalculia,
> Dyspraxia, Dysgraphia, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
> Disorder, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD),
> Asperger Syndrome, High-functioning autism,
> hyperlexia, etc) your discussion in this video fails
> even to mention this.
>
> This is unacceptable.
>
> How many of your commissioners and senior executives
> have any of these conditions?
>
> Though the figure of 6% of people with disabilities
> being in wheelchairs is often quoted, this far smaller
> group got loads of coverage as always in the DRC
> video. The official symbol for disability remains,
> invariably, the wheelchair.
>
> Colin Revell fought for over 5 years just to get a
> neurodiversity diagnosis. NHS guidelines state 6
> months maximum for outpatients.
>
> As for the local government ombudsman, in my
> considered view he fails utterly to follow the
> principles of the Whyatt Report (on which the
> legislation to introduce the Ombudsman was based). I
> should know: my grandfather, Sir John Whyatt, wrote
> it.
> He was famously fair.
>
> He would turn in his grave at the idea of anyone from
> a disadvantaged group being denied proper care by the
> local authorities.This is Colin's situation.
>
> I have my first,preliminary appointment with the
> Dyscovery Centre,Cardiff, where Colin was finally
> diagnosed this Tuesday.My medical records indicate I
> first asked for a referral for Dyspraxia on 04 August
> 1999.
>
> I can not imagine you treating a wheelchair user,a
> limbless person, a deaf person or a blind person with
> such contempt.
>
> Colin has my full support as a neurodiverse martyr
> against the DRC's apparent impairmentism and
> neurotypicalism.
>
> Re-double your efforts Colin!
>
> I would be more than happy to meet with you to discuss
> the case and how to educate your workforce in how best
> to meet the needs of neurodiverse people and to combat
> discrimination against neurodiverse people in general
> throughout the UK.
>
> That is why I have to support Colin on this.
>
>
> Yours sincerely
>
> Adrian Whyatt, Dyspraxia Foundation Adult Support
> Group National and London Treasurer
>
> --- ColRevs <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >
> 17/12/02
> >
> > Mr Shrimpton, DRC
> >
> > You stated the following...."Disability Rights
> > Commission currently deals
> > with over 110,000 calls/year to its helpline.
> > Similarly, the Casework Team
> > is dealing with very high volumes of cases.  It is
> > not fair to our many
> > customers to dedicate substantial resources on a
> > regular basis to one
> > customer, whose issues we cannot resolve and seem
> > generally vexatious."....
> >
> > You can't come-out with a generalised statement that
> > a customer is a
> > vexatious complainer without  having the evidence
> > and substance to back up
> > your generalisation, in which I feel offended and
> > feel that the DRC are
> > discriminating against me without lawful
> > justification.
> >
> > As you can see from my e-mails yesterday I'm very
> > angry at the DRC and the
> > people whom work within this organisation. You and
> > your officers have a poor
> > understanding of anti-oppressive practices.
> >
> > I feel victimised due to me enforcing my basic human
> > rights as a disabled
> > person whom is being discriminated by the various
> > 'public-authorities' in
> > which I've complained to you. You have failed to
> > justify to me your reasons
> > for not investigating my complaints.
> >
> > The only excuse you have put forward is of one of
> > lack of resources, but
> > this does not justify the DRC stating that I'm a
> > vexatious complainer and
> > there is no substance to my complaints.
> >
> > How do you know when you have not carried out any
> > investigations?
> >
> > I also believe that you are protecting these 'public
> > authorities' I've
> > complained against, especially the local Government
> > Ombudsman and as an
> > organisation you are condoning discrimination and
> > victimisation, in which I
> > find unacceptable and abusive, under the Human
> > Rights Act.
> >
> > I want to make a further complaint to your Chair and
> > other Senior Executives
> > and I will be taken this matter further and
> > discussing with my  peers within
> > the disabled people's movement.
> >
> > I will also be taken further legal advice from a
> > human rights barrister to
> > take action against the DRC under the Human Rights
> > Act for abusive and
> > discriminatory
> > treatment and behaviour towards me in an inhumane
> > and degrading way.
> >
> > I will also asking my advisor to write to my local
> > MP to make a complaint to
> > the Parliamentary Ombudsman.
> >
> > If you think this matter is forgotten and at an end
> > then you have another
> > thing coming. I will not be threatened by the DRC or
> > any other Government
> > organisation. I'm not a 'victim'  for your own
> > personal pleasure.
> >
> > I'm not going to be bullied by the DRC and it's
> > officers. I have basic human
> > rights and I will do everything in my powers to make
> > sure that I receive
> > 'justice' and with my disabled peers we will not
> > allow disabled people to
> > have our 'voices' silenced by your organisation or
> > any other 'quango'.
> >
> > We all have a democratic rights to expect to a
> > better service from the DRC
> > and have protection against discrimination, but if
> > these decisions are being
> > made on economic grounds, then the DRC have no-place
> > within the human
> > rights agenda of disabled people and should be seen
> > for what they are as a
> > 'token-gesture' by the 'NEW  RIGHT' politicians with
> > 'hidden-agendas'.
> >
> > I for one are not fooled by your 'mask'. I don't
> > know how you and your staff
> > sleep at night knowing that there are millions of
> > disabled people being
> > 'socially and economically excluded'.
> >
> > All you can do is bully disabled people like myself
> > for enforcing our human
> > rights. Then as a human rights activist, then you
> > try to 'demonise' me and
> > others as vexatious complainers.
> >
> > 'Get-Real' and get out of your ivory tower and see
> > what oppression disabled
> > people are experiencing in the U,K and the global
> > world, and how do you
> > respond ? You try and silence my and others 'voices'
> > and threaten me with
> > the following comments....
> >
> > "I must now ask you to stop contacting the DRC
> > Helpline or any Casework
> > colleagues.  If you feel you cannot comply with this
> > instruction, I will be
> > forced to consider action that will restrain you
> > from making that contact."
> >
> > Do you think other disabled people and I are going
> > to accept you oppressive
> > behaviour ? As I siad yesterday I will discuss all
> > the issues within your
> > e-mail with other disabled people within the
> > movement and I for one won't
> > take this lying down.
> >
> > Yours Sincerely
> >
> > Mr  Colin Revell... your e-mail included below...
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mark Shrimpton" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:42 AM
> > Subject: Your business with the Disability Rights
> > Commission
> >
> >
> > > Dear Mr Revell
> > >
> > > Your business with the Disability Rights
> > Commission
> > >
> > > On the afternoon of Thursday, 12th December, the
> > Casework Management Team
> > met to discuss the 19 referrals you have asked us to
> > consider since we
> > opened our doors for business in April 2000.
> > >
> > > None of the issues you have raised have produced a
> > successful outcome.
> > That is because they have largely been outside of
> > the scope of the
> > Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and, therefore,
> > the remit of the
> > Disability Rights Commission.  Where the matters you
> > have raised do fall
> > within scope of the Act, it appears that service
> > providers have made
> > reasonable attempts to address your concerns.
> > >
> > > The Disability Rights Commission currently deals
> > with over 110,000
> > calls/year to its helpline.  Similarly, the Casework
> > Team is dealing with
> > very high volumes of cases.  It is not fair to our
> > many customers to
> > dedicate substantial resources on a regular basis to
> > one customer, whose
> > issues we cannot resolve and seem generally
> > vexatious.
> > >
> > > For this reason a decision has been made by the
> > management team not to
> > devote further resources to investigating your
> > recent allegations.  All
> > current files registered in your interest will,
> > therefore, be closed.
> > >
> > > Regrettably, I accept and support that decision
> > and have instructed the
> > DRC Helpline and Casework Teams accordingly.
> > >
> > > I must now ask you to stop contacting the DRC
> > Helpline or any Casework
> > colleagues.  If you feel you cannot comply with this
> > instruction, I will be
> > forced to consider action that will restrain you
> > from making that contact.
> > >
> > > Yours sincerely
> >
> === message truncated ===
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> http://uk.my.yahoo.com
>

________________End of message______________________

Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:

www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html

You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager