> From [log in to unmask] Fri Jan 17 12:13 MET 2003
> X-RAL-MFrom: <[log in to unmask]>
> X-RAL-Connect: <mail05.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.21]>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
> Importance: Normal
> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:12:56 -0000
> From: Jon Hanna <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy revisited
> To: [log in to unmask]
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0
> tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
> USER_AGENT_OUTLOOK
> version=2.43
>
> > Suppose i retrieve a picture from a URL1, which according to my
> > previous knowledge shows a cat and you assert in some
> > semantic web URL1 --rdf:type--> "dog"
> > Can you tell what conclusion i should make in your semantic web?
>
> That at least one of the representations or assertions is wrong.
>
> The semantic web will never introduce infallibility or guaranteed honesty.
>
>
Yupp! Exactly.
rs
|