>
> The Web architecture does not guaruntee that you'll get anything if
> you dereference a URL, but the basic design presumes you will. Likewise,
> the basic design (IMO) of the SW presumes that URIs denote only one
> thing and what you might get when dereferencing that URI is a
> representation of that one thing (not e.g. another resource defining
> relations of the resource denoted by that URI with other resources,
> i.e. a RDDL document).
What this ONE thing is, is in the hand of the owner of the web-address
and NOT in the hand of third party, who makes assertions about the thing.
Say i put up an image file at U1 and you put up some RDF:
U1 --Rating--> "ugly stuff"
I find your rating and change the image to some other image.
Still your assertions stands, but....
I wonder what will happen with the RDF files to which
the RDF and RDFS namespace uri's de-reference.
The RDF at the RDFS namespace URI even contains a link
to still someother RDF.
When x --isA--> Test1GradeA then it also can be true
x --isA--> Test2GradeA
You seem to argue the first assertion prevents the second to hold.
rs
|