JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ADULT-PROTECTION Archives


ADULT-PROTECTION Archives

ADULT-PROTECTION Archives


ADULT-PROTECTION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ADULT-PROTECTION Home

ADULT-PROTECTION Home

ADULT-PROTECTION  January 2003

ADULT-PROTECTION January 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

From:

Tina Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Information related to research and practice in Adult Protection studies <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:43:38 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (64 lines)

Hugh - Sheffield Social Services wrote a guidance document in 1998
concerning investigating allegations of abuse against staff - Tel. 0114 273
4811.  We are working on the same issue, through the Wolverhampton Adult
Protection Committee arena, and in a West Midlands regional coordinators
arena.  Any examples where things went wrong or right would be most welcome!

In terms of best practice, I would suggest that this needs to be wider than
just achieving a successful prosecution, or the outcome of a disciplinary
investigation.  The issue of who is responsible for reporting staff to
professional or regulatory bodies needs clarity.  I know of a recent case
where the Nursing & Midwifery Council agreed to investigate a group of
nurses where no one nurse could be determined to be culpable of neglect, but
it was reported to them by the family because the employers did not accept
that neglect had occurred, and the statutory organisation with the evidence
felt it was the employers' responsibility to report this to the NMC.

I am currently considering the effect of employers asking staff to write
accounts of events separately, in separate rooms, with no interview to
potentially bias evidence.  Checks on rotas, records, etc. obviously
determine whether it was possible for the event to have occurred, involving
the people named.  These can then be considered by a multi-agency strategy
group, which may include both Police and Human Resource Managers, to decide
the next steps.

I have evidence of a case where a worker was dismissed prior to the case
being heard in court, and the Judge refusing to hear the case on the day!
So much for Achieving Best Evidence.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ellis, Hugh - Social and Health Care Directorate
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 30 January 2003 14:28
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject:


Hi everyone
I'm trying to develop good practice guidance primarily on the process of
investigation by employers into allegations of vulnerable adult abuse by
employees.
I've come across a large number of such investigations where people have
either not known how to go about such an investigation or where poor
practice, primarily due to lack of guidance, has meant that no action could
be taken. One example recently related to the abuse of a number of older
people by a housing association warden. there was a great deal of
corroborating evidence but beacause the alleged perpetrator was not directly
asked about any of the allegations until the disciplinary tribunal no action
could be taken.
I'm anticipating focusing on the process in terms of:
*       Obtaining a statement from the victim
*       Interviewing alleged perpetrators
*       Preparation and submission of evidence etc
and drawing on police practice to identify good practice.
Has anybody already done any work in this area, or have any useful info that
would help?
Many thanks
hugh

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: This email and files transmitted are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient.  If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you may not copy, disclose, distribute or use it in any unauthorised manner.  If you have received this email in error please notify us by telephoning on 01902-554455 or by email to [log in to unmask] and then delete it and any attachments accompanying it.  Please note that Wolverhampton City Council cannot guarantee that this message or any attachments are virus free or have not been intercepted and amended.
Any views or opinions expressed within this email are those of the author and may not necessarily reflect those of Wolverhampton City Council and no contractual arrangement is intended to arise from this communication.

 =============================================================================

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2013
August 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
May 2011
March 2011
January 2011
November 2010
October 2010
April 2010
July 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
November 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
December 2005
September 2005
August 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
January 2003
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager