To whoever moderates this list,
I just replied to the post below, thinking I was replying to Peter (I just
didn't pay attention to the return address). I said somethings in my reply that
I would not want to be posted to the list, so if you can, would you simply not
post my response? Thanks very much.
John Kingston
Quoting Automatic digest processor <[log in to unmask]>:
> There is one message totalling 44 lines in this issue.
>
> Topics of the day:
>
> 1. Linguistics Abstracts/Journal of the International Phonetic
> Association
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:27:00 -0800
> From: Ladefoged <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Linguistics Abstracts/Journal of the International Phonetic
> Association
>
> Can anybody help us by telling us what they think of Linguistics Abstracts?
> They wrote to me as an Editor of jipa asking us to to send them abstracts.
> I passed the request on to Patrick McCartan at Cambridge, who replied
> as below. If we nobody on this list replies we'll know what to think.
>
> Thanks all
>
> Peter
>
> >
> >Hi Peter,
> >
> >OK, I'll arrange to set this up. But I have to say I'm not a keen supporter
> >of the project. The publishers of Linguistics Abstracts receive free
> >journals from participating publishers (of which Cambridge is a significant
> >one) and simply cut and paste the abstracts in the various journals into
> >Linguistics Abstracts - there is no editing of abstracts in Cambridge
> >journals, as far as I can see - for which they charge institutions the
> >princely sum of $1055 a year.
> >
> >I'd be interested for your thoughts, in particular how widely LA is used by
> >the community. I could well be mistaken of course about the amount of
> >effort that it takes to create LA.
> >
> >Best wishes,
> >
> >Patrick
>
> --
> Peter Ladefoged Jenny Ladefoged
> Professor of Phonetics, Emeritus Canon of the Cathedral
> Church, Los Angeles
>
> Telephone: 310 441 5909
> Fax: 310 206 5743
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of PHONET Digest - 15 Jan 2003 to 17 Jan 2003 (#2003-4)
> ***********************************************************
>
|