JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FORCED-MIGRATION Archives


FORCED-MIGRATION Archives

FORCED-MIGRATION Archives


FORCED-MIGRATION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FORCED-MIGRATION Home

FORCED-MIGRATION Home

FORCED-MIGRATION  2003

FORCED-MIGRATION 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Workshop: Call for papers

From:

Forced Migration List <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Forced Migration List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:37:40 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Transferring Best Practice:  
An international workshop on the comparative study of refugee return  
programmes with reference to the Palestinian context  
 
9-11th June 2004 
University of Exeter, UK   
A Call for Papers  
  
Rationale  
 
The Palestinian refugee issue is the most difficult of the outstanding  
problems in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. With a growth  
rate of 3.1 percent, the registered refugee population of 3.7 million is  
increasing at approximately 110,000 per annum. It is therefore an issue that  
will not fade away over time and delay only increases the magnitude of the  
problems to be solved. The suffering and political instability caused by the  
non-resolution of this issue is plain to see.  
 
The study of the Palestinian refugee issue is also one characterised by  
exceptionalism. The commonly-held view is that the Palestinian refugee  
situation is unique because of its longevity and because of the evolution of  
relief structures outside the main UN agency dealing with refugees, UNHCR.  
Consequently, it is argued that its resolution should also be designed from  
within its context. In addition, the issue is usually debated, and solutions  
are proposed, in terms of political and human rights. While these are  
essential elements of a solution, one result has been the failure to utilise  
the experience of UNHCR and other international NGOs. This in turn has led to  
a restricted range of policy options.   
 
Aims and Objectives  
 
The workshop has two main aims:   
a. to link discussions over the future of Palestinian refugees to the broader  
experience of repatriation and resettlement activities of UNHCR and other  
international NGOs;  
b. to draw on social science comparative methodologies as a tool for  
identifying pre-requisites for an effective and durable repatriation  
programme.  
 
The intention, therefore, is to bring to bear upon the Palestinian context the  
corpus of evaluative literature and "best practice" reports built up by UNHCR  
and other international NGOs.   
 
The workshop will draw together specialists from a number of different refugee  
return situations and through the presentation of papers and debate, examine  
the relevance of this material to the Palestinian context. The organisers will  
also invite participation from local and international NGOs, Israeli and  
Palestinian government officials, the World Bank, UNHCR, UNRWA, and the EU.  
The workshop will be the first such gathering on the relevance of comparative  
studies to the Palestinian refugee issue that draws together both scholars and  
practitioners.   
 
Methodology  
 
Preliminary research into the relevance of other refugee situations to the  
Palestinian context has shown that the selection of comparative case studies  
can be problematic. Some aspects of a refugee situation are comparable while  
others are not. For example, it may be possible to compare the demographic  
profiles of a number of refugee populations and similarities in historical  
evolution may be found, but at the same time cultural differences may preclude  
extrapolating from these similarities in order to construct similar  
operational repatriation programmes. Nevertheless, the same research  
indicates, that despite such flaws, the exercise is instructive and can be  
illuminating: the very points at which comparative symmetry breaks down can  
itself identify those features of the Israeli-Palestinian situation which most  
need to be addressed. Indeed, the accumulation of case studies has been the  
basis of the UNHCR best practice reports leading to the formulation of  
guidelines and conventions.   
 
Thus, while strict comparability may not be achievable, the choice of case  
studies can still be guided by a systematic procedure of argued criteria. In  
this way relevance rather than strict comparability can serve as a guiding  
principle. Case studies can be selected in the light of the following  
considerations: comparability in demographic profile rather than absolute  
numbers; relevance of historical trajectory, relevance of host country  
involvement, relevance of regional political structures and of lead agency  
operations, and finally, the accessibility of primary data either in the form  
of documentation or through interviews of key personnel.   
 
The workshop is intended to contribute to the creation of a pool of research  
that will assist in comparative analysis. Research papers on single case  
studies that address the three following themes are invited:   
 
a. The regional political agreements and multilateral frameworks for return  
programmes.(eg UNHCR-government/host country agreements) that are necessary  
before a return programme can take place.  
 
Suggested topics to be included: the role of international law in developing a  
framework for an agreement; the specificity in such agreements of refugee  
rights, restitution, compensation, funding etc; refugee participation in  
constructing agreements.  
 
b. The kind of institutional structures and lead agencies  
(private/public/voluntary sector provision) that can provide the most  
satisfactory vehicles for an effective return programme.  
 
Suggested topics to be included: the nature of and mechanisms for donor  
coordination; role of NGO communities and civil society in process; assessment  
of strengths and weaknesses of structures created.  
 
c. The range of options that are available for refugees (eg compensation,  
return, host or third country resettlement) in the construction of a return  
programme.  
 
Suggested topics to be included: mechanisms for the communication of options  
to refugee communities; preparation time required; link between different  
options; sources of compensation funds; the role of reconciliation and  
restorative justice programmes. 
 
It is hoped that most of the papers offered would deal with all three themes  
within the case studies but papers that focus on only one or two of the themes  
will also be considered. Alternative comparative frameworks will also be  
considered if they add both to the debate on the utility of comparative  
studies and provide additional insights to a case study.   
 
In addition the workshop will include a thematic section comprising the  
following subjects:  
 
a. gender issues and female empowerment  
b. the role of the donor community - constraints, coordination and influence  
c. statelessness and nationality in framing agreements  
d. comparative perspectives on property restitution  
e. the role of data collection and analysis in constructing operational  
programmes  
f. post-agreement protection and the status of refugees.  
  
Organisation  
 
Dr Mick Dumper, Department of Politics, University of Exeter, will coordinate  
the workshop. It is funded by the International Development Research Centre  
(IDRC)(Ottawa) and the Department for International Development (UK  
government). A Steering Committee comprising Professor Richard Black, Editor  
of the Journal for Refugee Studies, Dr Sari Hanafi, Director of Shaml, the  
Palestinian Diaspora and Refugee Centre, Terry Rempel, Research Coordinator,  
Badil Resource Centre for Palestinian Residency and Refugee Rights, Roula el- 
Rifai from IDRC will advise the Coordinator on the selection of the papers and  
the programme.  
 
In order to ensure that the material from the workshop is disseminated as  
widely as possible, it is intended to publish the papers in a single volume  
edited by Mick Dumper. The provisional title is: Comparative Perspectives on  
Refugee Return Programmes. It will comprise both papers submitted to the  
workshop and an introductory and a number of analytical chapters based upon  
the case studies presented.   
 
Abstracts of no more than 300 words should be sent to the address below by  
15th January. Authors of accepted papers will be informed by 15th February.  
Complete papers are to be submitted by 30th April.  
 
Presenters will receive an honorarium of 500 for their paper. Half will be  
paid at the workshop and the remainder after revisions have been made for  
publication. Presenters and invited participants will also receive travel  
expenses, accommodation and full board at the Royal Clarence Hotel in Exeter  
where most of the sessions of the workshop will also be held.  
 
Correspondence to:  
Dr Michael Dumper, 
Reader in Middle East Politics, 
School of Historical, Political and Sociological Studies, 
University of Exeter. 
EX4 4RJ. DEVON, UK  
Email: [log in to unmask] 
Fax: 00 44 1392 263305 
Tel: 00 44 1392 263167/ 
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
Note: The material contained in this communication comes to you from the 
Forced Migration Discussion List which is moderated by the Refugee Studies 
Centre (RSC), University of Oxford. It does not necessarily reflect the 
views of the RSC or the University. If you re-print, copy, archive or 
re-post this message please retain this disclaimer. Quotations or extracts 
should include attribution to the original sources. 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager