JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CARIBBEAN-STUDIES Archives


CARIBBEAN-STUDIES Archives

CARIBBEAN-STUDIES Archives


CARIBBEAN-STUDIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CARIBBEAN-STUDIES Home

CARIBBEAN-STUDIES Home

CARIBBEAN-STUDIES  2003

CARIBBEAN-STUDIES 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Week in Europe

From:

Amanda Sives <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Amanda Sives <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:57:26 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (59 lines)

The Week in Europe

By David Jessop

 

As each week passes, the options for restructuring the Caribbean sugar industry lessen. 

 

This week the European Commission (EC) published outline proposals for the reform of Europe’s sugar regime. In doing so Europe began formally a process that will determine the viability or otherwise of cane industries throughout the Caribbean and other nations in the African, Caribbean and Pacific group of states (the ACP). This is because the price that European farmers of beet receive is linked under preferential agreements to that paid for agreed volumes of sugar coming from the ACP.

 

Vastly over simplified, the EU is initiating a debate on three main options for its producers. An extension of the present European regime beyond 2006 involving flexible quotas and price intervention.   A reduction in the EU internal price involving the phasing out of quotas once the levels of imports and production have stabilised. And a complete liberalisation of the current regime involving the the removal of import tariffs and quantitative restrictions on imports. Each option has implications for all sugar producers not least in relation to the price that will be paid in future to Caribbean farmers.

Even though the sugar industry in the region has been declining for decades and now contributes relatively small amounts to the Caribbean’s GDP, significant numbers remain employed by the industry in Guyana, Jamaica, Belize, St Kitts and less so in Trinidad and Barbados. In some of these nations a precipitate decline or collapse in the industry could result in social instability on a scale not previously seen.

 

Last week in Miami the Chairman of Jamaica’s Sugar Industry Authority, Derick Heaven, began to spell out the implications if nothing were done and the industry were to suffer collapse. 

 

Speaking at the World Sugar 2003 conference, he made clear to participants that closing down the sugar industry in Jamaica and in other Caribbean economies, without the development of meaningful alternatives, will spell economic disaster.

 

He noted the challenges facing the industry in international trade negotiations were extensive. Brazil together with Australia and Thailand were challenging Europe’s sugar regime at the WTO. This was, Ambassador Heaven noted, undermining the deliberative process of the phasing out preferences. The challenge was being mounted in a manner that was likely to harm Caribbean sugar producing countries. This, he said were going on without any special consideration for small and vulnerable economies such as those in the Caribbean. 

 

The Chairman of the Jamaican industry went on to note that the negotiations for the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) and the Central American Free Trade Area also have the potential to threaten to the survival of sugar in the Caribbean. Brazil, Columbia, and other low cost sugar producers in the Americas are expected to demand equal or better access to the US and Canadian markets to that granted previously to Mexico for sugar. While the lobbying for and against may result eventually in it being agreed to have sugar the subject of a multilateral agreement at the WTO, Ambassador Heaven saw little sign that the countries involved were showing any consideration for the impact on the Caribbean. 

 

These challenges, he told delegates, were matched by other significant threats to the industry in Europe. These included the mid term review of Europe’s common agricultural policy (CAP); the long term effects of the enlargement of the EU to twenty-five member states; the implications of the EU’s Everything But Arms initiative that grants quota and duty free access for sugar and other commodities from the least developed countries; and the uncertain outcome of the proposed Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs), in which the EU will try to re-negotiate the terms and conditions of the existing sugar protocol.

 

From Ambassador Heaven remarks and those of others it is clear that trade negotiations are having a profoundly negative effect with much of the regional industry unable or unwilling to make robust long-term investment decisions, or activate fully the restructuring that is necessary to survive.  

Worse, it seems as if the social and by extension political implications are being glossed over. In Jamaica about 0.2m people derive their livelihood directly and indirectly from the sugar industry. About one half of the population lives in sugar dependent parishes and areas. If the sugar industry continues to decline, rural–urban migration from sugar parishes to urban areas would be aggravated increasing poverty and crime. This will have negative consequences for social stability in Jamaica as well as, by extension, for Europe and North America.  

The industry in the Caribbean needs an adequate period of adjustment to properly confront these challenges. It requires Europe to think hard about the development of flexible, rapidly delivered appropriate compensatory and other mechanisms. Equally Governments and the industry must decide on a clear course of action based on a realistic appreciation of future price levels and begin now the tough process of restructuring, ideally with support from external donors. 

The truth is that it can no longer be business as usual in sugar. The challenges to existing trade arrangements may make life uncertain but it is very clear that the only direction for prices presently paid under preferential arrangements, is down.  Governments and the industry need to agree rapidly on how they will restructure their industries, how they will encourage new economic activity and how in negotiations they will ensure that the money required to rationalise their cane industry is forthcoming.  

 

David Jessop is the Director of the Caribbean Council and can be contacted at [log in to unmask]

September 26th, 2003



---------------------------------
Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo!Messenger

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager