JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC  2003

POETRYETC 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Orbiter dicta, etc

From:

seiferle <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating to poetry and poetics <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 19 Jan 2003 21:39:21 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (66 lines)

Hi Jon,

just some comments.


<<It isn't often noticed that the successful political poetry of the past is
staunchly conservative.  >>


Well, I think this is dependent upon that "successful." For surely if one lauds the Emperor, one will be successful, no? the poem will be dispersed throughout the Empire and copied on all the scrolls? So by definition, it would have to be a staunchly conservative political poetry that would receive the most press and notice. However, some might argue that the best political poetry is satire.

<<Maybe poets of the past felt that politics weren't really very important, so
they might as well adopt whichever politics are expedient for their career.>>

I don't know, you use the example of Eliot and MacDiarmid, and they certainly don't seem illustrative of those who thought that politics weren't important. Whatever one may say about them, they were both poets of deeply held social and political views. I would think their correspondence was more dependent upon a mutual respect, an understanding of a common ground and measures of discourse, and so could accomodate such divergent views.


<<
Literary revolutionaries now are the ones who wear sandals instead of
loafers in the English Department coffee room.  There's something pathetic
about a bohemian with a fellowship.>>

Well, you know I can't help but think about those old, real, Bohemians, like Cesar Vallejo in Trujillo who could have used a fellowship. Perhaps most in English Departments come from the same background, but I'm not certain of that. I don't find much use in this sort of dismissal on the basis of one's external definition and often shallow understanding of another, in poetry, or anywhere.

Which is why I keep emphasizing that it is the work that matters, the particular, not the anecdotal or the personal or the use of others to illustrate one's ideas.


<<Incidentally the Merriam Webster College Dictionary, which is considered
standard at least for US usage, says that avant-garde can be an adjective
and gives "avant-garde writers" as an example.>>

Yes, our Webster's. I wasn't unaware that the term is legally an adjective, just arguing for a more adjectival usage of it in this discussion. Even your quote uses it as an adjective for the writers, not the work, and I was thinking as an adjective of the work, it would allow more more.

<<-----------------------------------------------
Yesterday by accident I came across one of the few recent poetry books that
seems worthy of my attention:  Looking for Poetry:  Poems by Carlos Drummond
de Andrade and Rafael Alberti / Songs from the Quechua,>>

Yes, Andrade and Alberti will reward any further study! As for Quechua, it is a very vivid language, but perhaps best approached on its own terms. There's a book, Signs, Songs, and Memory in the Andes: Translating Quechua Language and Culture by Regina Harrison that is particularly adept at conveying the quality of the poetry and its much different cultural context. The Spanish texts often added a gloss of orthodoxy.

<<
Bircumshaw is summed up by its statement, drawn from Andrew
Jordan, that "the middle-classes have created a hegemony in the poetry
world, while sounding off about tolerance and inclusion..." >>

Yes, good summary, but my point is still why should a piece which so purports to be a book review be so summarized? no mention of the work, the book, a poem, etc.


<<Rebecca Seiferle's comments should be footnoted
to record that the reviewer's observations of Ruth Padel's "sexiness' were
an extension of the remark quoted in the review's first sentence that "Ruth
Padel is 'the sexiest voice in British poetry,'" attributed to Maggie
O'Farrell.>>

thanks for the footnote. When I argued against sexiness as a criteria for reviews of poetry collections, I mentioned whether it was viewed "pro or con," the pro was the original remark of O'Farrell's upon which I cast equal aspersion. :)

As for your original question on Sappho which was I think how she became so famous in such a patriarchal society? more or less, my view is that Sappho became much more disturbing to later societies than she was in her own. She was an aristocrat, apparently connected to a cult of Aphrodite, mentored young women, prior to their marriage, and so inhabited a realm--of love, of feminine experience, of the worship of Aphrodite--that Greek society allowed to women. If she had been talking in the Polis, that would have been another matter. Also the Greeks knew more of her than we do, so perhaps there was some other way in which her work resonated with her culture. So little of her work has survived because the very qualities that granted her esteem in her own culture became reasons to burn her work in subsequent eras. I think it's simply that the uses of power are rarely simplistic, and history is not particularly progressive; between us and her perhaps there is more abyss than asce!
nt.

Best,

Rebecca

Rebecca Seiferle
www.thedrunkenboat.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager