Or cavities that don't fit in those bodies. Depends upon one's point of view.
I think you're right. My sense of humor may have been collateral damage.
Or it may have been for me too close to the thought police stuff one gets
too often--the Calvinist "if you meditate upon yourself long and hard
enough you'll find the sin." My internal inquisitor doesn't work that way.
Mark
At 11:14 PM 4/14/2003 +0100, you wrote:
>On Monday 14 Apr 2003 3:02 am, you wrote:
> > This is an astonishing statement. If the behavior you find offensive can't
> > be named one has no choice but to ignore your claim. One certainly won't be
> > able to amend one's behavior, presuming that one isn't aware of it or its
> > implications.
> >
> > I'm assuming, of course, that you're not engaging in some extraordinarily
> > gauche humor.
>
>Oh, I think the latter, to a hysterical(ly funny, or "gauche" if you don't
>find it funny) degree. Although there's a serious point being made as well:
>all the boy-girl-fight stuff defines a fairly restrictive gender universe;
>meanwhile there are bodies that don't fit into those cavities.
>
>Dom
|